Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31420881›Full record

ReviewThe Medical journal of Australia2019

Pulmonary challenges of prolonged journeys to space: taking your lungs to the moon.

G Kim Prisk

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Medical journal of Australia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Dusty Road for Astronauts.Biomedicines · 2023
    Review
  13. Surgery in the Next Space Missions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

G Kim PriskUniversity of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
University of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Proton MRI to measure lung ventilation and perfusionR01HL119263 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI PRISK, GORDON KIM · 2014 to 2017
$3.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL119263
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Space flight presents a set of physiological challenges to the space explorer which result from the absence of gravity (or in the case of planetary exploration, partial gravity), radiation exposure, isolation and a prolonged period in a confined environment, distance from Earth, the need to venture outside in the hostile environment of the destination, and numerous other factors. Gravity affects regional lung function, and the human lung shows considerable alteration in function in low gravity; however, this alteration does not result in deleterious changes that compromise lung function upon return to Earth. The decompression stress associated with extravehicular activity, or spacewalk, does not appear to compromise lung function, and future habitat (living quarter) designs can be engineered to minimise this stress. Dust exposure is a significant health hazard in occupational settings such as mining, and exposure to extraterrestrial dust is an almost inevitable consequence of planetary exploration. The combination of altered pulmonary deposition of extraterrestrial dust and the potential for the dust to be highly toxic likely makes dust exposure the greatest threat to the lung in planetary exploration.

Indexed as

Aerospace MedicineModels, BiologicalSpace FlightHumansLungMoonAerospace medicineLung diseasesPhysiologyRespiration disorders

Identifiers

PMID31420881
PMCPMC6745695
OpenAlexW2968138095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.