Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31420857›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2020

Delayed Diagnosis of Anal Cancer.

Katherine Bingmer, Asya Ofshteyn, Sharon L Stein, Emily Steinhagen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katherine BingmerUniversity Hospitals Research in Surgical Outcomes & Effectiveness Center (UH-RISES), Department of Surgery, University Hospitals, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Asya OfshteynUniversity Hospitals Research in Surgical Outcomes & Effectiveness Center (UH-RISES), Department of Surgery, University Hospitals, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Sharon L SteinUniversity Hospitals Research in Surgical Outcomes & Effectiveness Center (UH-RISES), Department of Surgery, University Hospitals, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Emily SteinhagenUniversity Hospitals Research in Surgical Outcomes & Effectiveness Center (UH-RISES), Department of Surgery, University Hospitals, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. emily.steinhagen@uhhospitals.org.ORCID 0000-0002-1155-6624
University Hospitals of Cleveland · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent literature has shown disparities in diagnosis and treatment of anal cancer. Common perception is that many anal cancer patients may experience a delay in diagnosis and this may contribute to poor outcomes.

methodsPatients diagnosed with anal cancer at a single academic institution from 2006 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified according to time from symptom onset to diagnosis and divided into three groups: diagnosed within 6 weeks, between 6 weeks and 6 months, and greater than 6 months.

resultsA total of 93 patients were included in this study. Twenty-two (23.7%) were diagnosed within 6 weeks, 48 (51.6%) between 6 weeks and 6 months, and 23 (24.7%) were diagnosed more than 6 months after the onset of symptoms. Over half (57%) of all patients were initially diagnosed with a benign condition. Stage did not vary significantly between groups. Patient diagnosed within 6 weeks had the highest rates of completion of chemotherapy (90%), radiation (95%), and complete response to chemoradiation (77%) but these did not reach statistical significance. There was no difference in recurrence, or overall survival between the groups.

conclusionsOver half of anal cancer patients were initially misdiagnosed, and 25% were symptomatic for more than 6 months prior to diagnosis. Those patients diagnosed earlier tended to be more likely to receive complete chemoradiation therapy. We were unable to show a statistical difference in outcomes between groups. Further investigation into provider education and awareness of anal cancer is warranted to improve the care of these patients.

Indexed as

AgedAnus NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Squamous CellDelayed DiagnosisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentTime FactorsAnal cancerDelayed diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID31420857
OpenAlexW2967056675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.