Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31420825›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2019

The Care Transitions Measure-3 Is Only Weakly Associated with Post-discharge Outcomes: a Retrospective Cohort Study in 48,384 Albertans.

Finlay A McAlister, Mu Lin, Jeff Bakal, Kyle A Kemp, Hude Quan

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. RE: Patient-Reported Quality of Hospital Discharge Transitions.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Finlay A McAlisterDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. Finlay.McAlister@ualberta.ca.
Mu LinData Platform, Alberta Strategy for Patient Oriented Research Support Unit, Alberta Innovates, Edmonton, Canada.
Jeff BakalData Platform, Alberta Strategy for Patient Oriented Research Support Unit, Alberta Innovates, Edmonton, Canada.
Kyle A KempDepartment of Community Health Sciences, O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Hude QuanDepartment of Community Health Sciences, O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe National Quality Forum endorsed a 3-item Care Transitions Measure (CTM-3), part of the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey, for evaluating hospital care transitions performance.

objectiveTo explore whether CTM-3 scores are a suitable proxy for quality of transitional care.

designRetrospective cohort study.

participantsA random sample of 48,384 adults discharged from medical or surgical wards in all 113 acute care hospitals in Alberta, Canada, between April 2011 and March 2016. MAIN MEASURES: CTM-3 scores and their associations with all-cause emergency department (ED) visits or non-elective readmissions at 30 days, 3 months, and 12 months anywhere in the province.

resultsCTM-3 scores were significantly lower (all p < 0.01) for females, older patients, those discharged from medical wards or teaching hospitals, and those with longer length of stay, higher Charlson scores, prior ED visits/hospitalizations, or who did not return to independent living after discharge. CTM-3 scores were not significantly associated with outcomes at 30 days (mean score 77.5 in those who subsequently had an ED visit/readmission vs. 77.9 in those who did not, p = 0.13, aOR 0.99, 95% CI 0.99-0.99). Although CTM-3 scores were significantly lower in patients who subsequently had ED visit/readmission at 3 months (77.5 vs. 78.5) and 12 months (77.6 vs. 79.5), the magnitude of risk was small: for every 10 point decrease in the CTM-3 score, the risk of ED visit/readmission was 2.6% higher (aOR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05) at 3 months and 4.0% higher (aOR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08) at 12 months.

conclusionsThe CTM-3 score is influenced by baseline patient and hospital factors, is not associated with 30-day post-discharge outcomes, and is only weakly associated with 3- and 12-month outcomes. These findings suggest that the CTM-3 score is not a good performance measure for the quality of transitional care.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdultAgedAlbertaEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient DischargePatient ReadmissionRetrospective StudiesTransitional CareHospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems surveypatient experience of care questionnairesqualityreadmissionstransitions of care

Identifiers

PMID31420825
PMCPMC6848721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.