Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31420796›Full record

ArticleJournal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology2019

Efficient production of glutathione with multi-pathway engineering in Corynebacterium glutamicum.

Wei Liu, Xiangcheng Zhu, Jiazhang Lian, Lei Huang, Zhinan Xu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Biosynthesis of Apigenin Glucosides in EngineeredJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  3. Fermentative Production of l-2-Hydroxyglutarate by EngineeredFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wei LiuKey Laboratory of Biomass Chemical Engineering (Education Ministry), College of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027, China.
Xiangcheng ZhuXiangya International Academy of Translational Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China. seanzhu1996@aliyun.com.
Jiazhang LianKey Laboratory of Biomass Chemical Engineering (Education Ministry), College of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027, China.
Lei HuangKey Laboratory of Biomass Chemical Engineering (Education Ministry), College of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027, China.
Zhinan XuKey Laboratory of Biomass Chemical Engineering (Education Ministry), College of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027, China. znxu@zju.edu.cn.
Zhejiang University · CNCentral South University · CN

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2018QNA4039National Key Technology Research & Development Program of The Ministry of Science & Technology of China (2015BAD15B00National Natural Science Foundation of China 21606205National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 21576232National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 21808199Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province No. LY18B060002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glutathione is a bioactive tripeptide composed of glycine, L-cysteine, and L-glutamate, and has been widely used in pharmaceutical, food, and healthy products. The current metabolic studies of glutathione were mainly focused on the native producing strains with precursor amino acid supplementation. In the present work, Corynebacterium glutamicum, a workhorse for industrial production of a series of amino acids, was engineered to produce glutathione. First, the introduction of glutathione synthetase gene gshF from Streptococcus agalactiae fulfilled the ability of glutathione production in C. glutamicum and revealed that L-cysteine was the limiting factor. Then, considering the inherent capability of L-glutamate synthesis and the availability of external addition of low-cost glycine, L-cysteine biosynthesis was enhanced using a varieties of pathway engineering methods, such as disrupting the degradation pathways of L-cysteine and L-serine, and removing the repressor responsible for sulfur metabolism. Finally, the simultaneously introduction of gshF and enhancement of cysteine formation enabled C. glutamicum strain to produce glutathione greatly. Without external addition of L-cysteine and L-glutamate, 756 mg/L glutathione was produced. This is first time to demonstrate the potential of the glutathione non-producing strain C. glutamicum for glutathione production and provide a novel strategy to construct glutathione-producing strains.

Indexed as

Corynebacterium glutamicumCysteineGlutamic AcidGlutathioneGlycineMetabolic EngineeringMetabolic Networks and PathwaysSerineCysteineGlutamic AcidGlutathioneGlycineSerineCorynebacterium glutamicumGlutathionegshFL-Cysteine

Identifiers

PMID31420796
OpenAlexW2967196390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.