ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2019
Central cardiovascular hemodynamic response to unilateral handgrip exercise with blood flow restriction.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effectiveness and safety of blood flow restriction training for the post-operation treatment of distal radius fracture.Annals of medicine · 2023Trial
- Cardiovascular responses during blood flow-restricted resistance exercise: a systematic review with meta-analysis.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2026Article
- Blood flow restriction training activates the muscle metaboreflex during low-intensity sustained exercise.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2023Article
- Impact of Blood-Flow-Restricted Training on Arterial Functions and Angiogenesis-A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Acute cardiovascular responses to unilateral bicep curls with blood flow restriction.Journal of exercise science and fitness · 2023Article
- Remote ischemic preconditioning enhances aerobic performance by accelerating regional oxygenation and improving cardiac function during acute hypobaric hypoxia exposure.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Heart rate and cardiac autonomic responses to concomitant deep breathing, hand grip exercise, and circulatory occlusion in healthy young adult men and women.Biological research · 2021Article
- Article
- Acute cardiovascular response to unilateral, bilateral, and alternating resistance exercise with blood flow restriction.European journal of applied physiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimExercise training with blood flow restriction (BFR) increases muscle size and strength. However, there is limited investigation into the effects of BFR on cardiovascular health, particularly central hemodynamic load. PURPOSE: To determine the effects of BFR exercise on central hemodynamic load (heart rate-HR, central pressures, arterial wave reflection, and aortic stiffness).
methodsFifteen males (age = 25 ± 2 years; BMI = 27 ± 2 kg/m
resultsHR increased above baseline and time control for all handgrip bouts, but was similar between the moderate load with and without BFR conditions (moderate-load with BFR = + 9 ± 2; moderate-load without BFR = + 8 ± 2 bpm, p < 0.001). A similar finding was noted for central pressure (e.g., moderate load with BFR, cMAP = + 14 ± 1 mmHg, p < 0.001). No change occurred for RM% or AIx (p > 0.05) for any testing stage. TSI% increased during the moderate-load conditions (p = 0.01), and aPWV increased above baseline following moderate-load handgrip with BFR only (p = 0.012).
conclusionsCombined with BFR, moderate load handgrip training with BFR does not significantly augment central hemodynamic load during handgrip exercise in young healthy men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31420736What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.