Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31420732›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2020

A porous polymeric-hydroxyapatite scaffold used for femur fractures treatment: fabrication, analysis, and simulation.

Saeid Esmaeili, Hossein Akbari Aghdam, Mehdi Motififard, Saeed Saber-Samandari, Amir Hussein Montazeran, Mohammad Bigonah, Erfan Sheikhbahaei, Amirsalar Khandan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Recent Developments in Polymer Nanocomposites for Bone Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Saeid EsmaeiliNew Technologies Research Center, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, 15875-4413, Iran.
Hossein Akbari AghdamDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Mehdi MotififardDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Saeed Saber-SamandariNew Technologies Research Center, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, 15875-4413, Iran.
Amir Hussein MontazeranNew Technologies Research Center, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, 15875-4413, Iran.
Mohammad BigonahMechanical Engineering Department, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Erfan SheikhbahaeiStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Amirsalar KhandanNew Technologies Research Center, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, 15875-4413, Iran. sas.khandan@aut.ac.ir.
Amirkabir University of Technology · IRIsfahan University of Medical Sciences · IRIran University of Science and Technology · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne of the most common fractures in the skeleton happens in the femur. One of the important reasons for this fracture is because it is the longest bone in the body and osteoporosis affect this part a lot. The geometric complexity and anisotropy properties of this bone have received a lot of attention in the orthopedic field.

methodsIn this research, a femur designed using 3D printing machine using the middle part of the hip made of polylactic acid-hydroxyapatite (PLA-HA) nanocomposite containing 0, 5, 10, 15, and 25 wt% of ceramic nanoparticle. Three different types of loadings, including centralized loading, full-scale, and partially loaded, were applied to the designed femur bone. The finite element analysis was used to analyze biomechanical components.

resultsThe results of the analysis showed that it is possible to use the porous scaffold model for replacement in the femur having proper strength and mechanical stability. Stress-strain analysis on femoral implant with biometric HA and PLA after modeling was performed using the finite element method under static conditions in Abaqus software.

conclusionThree scaffold structures, i.e., mono-, hybrid, and zonal structures, that can be fabricated using current bioprinting techniques are also discussed with respect to scaffold design.

Indexed as

Printing, Three-DimensionalTissue ScaffoldsBioengineeringCeramicsDurapatiteFemoral FracturesFinite Element AnalysisFracture Fixation, InternalHumansIranMaterials TestingNanoparticlesPolymersQualitative ResearchStress, MechanicalDurapatitePolymers3D printingBoneFemurFinite elements analysisFractureHydroxyapatiteStatic and dynamic analysis

Identifiers

PMID31420732
OpenAlexW2968970284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.