Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31420687›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2019

The influence of pacer-movement continuity and pattern matching on auditory-motor synchronisation.

Gregory Zelic, Patti Nijhuis, Sarah A Charaf, Peter E Keller, Chris Davis, Jeesun Kim, Manuel Varlet

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gregory ZelicThe MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.
Patti NijhuisThe MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.
Sarah A CharafThe MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.
Peter E KellerThe MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.
Chris DavisThe MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.
Jeesun KimThe MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.
Manuel VarletThe MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia. m.varlet@westernsydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5772-2061

Funding

Australian Research Council DP170104322Australian Research Council FT140101162
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People commonly move along with auditory rhythms in the environment. Although the processes underlying such sensorimotor synchronisation have been extensively investigated in the previous research, the properties of auditory rhythms that facilitate the synchronisation remain largely unclear. This study explored the possible benefits of a continuity matching between auditory pacers and the movement produced as well as of a spatial pattern matching that has been previously demonstrated with visual pacers. Participants synchronised either finger tapping or forearm oscillations with either discrete or continuous pacers. The pacers had either a spatial pattern (left-right panning) that matched the movement pattern produced or no spatial pattern. The accuracy and variability of synchronisation were assessed by the mean and standard deviation of the asynchronies, respectively, between participant's movement and the pacers. Results indicated that synchronisation was more accurate and less variable for discrete pacers and continuous movement (i.e., forearm oscillations). The interaction between those two factors involved a more complex relationship than a simple continuity match benefit. Although synchronisation variability increased with continuous pacers for both types of movement, this increase was smaller for continuous movement than discrete movement, suggesting that continuous movement is more beneficial only for continuous pacers. Moreover, the results revealed limited benefits of spatial pattern matching on auditory-motor synchronisation variability, which might be due to lower spatial resolution of the auditory sensory modality. Together, these findings confirm that sensorimotor synchronisation is modulated by complex relations between pacer and movement properties.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdultFemaleFingersHumansMaleMovementPeriodicityPhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceTime PerceptionYoung AdultAuditory rhythmContinuityCoordinationPanningSensorimotor synchronisationTapping

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.