Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31420666›Full record

ReviewAnnals of botany2020

Using the CODIT model to explain secondary metabolites of xylem in defence systems of temperate trees against decay fungi.

Hugh Morris, Ari M Hietala, Steven Jansen, Javier Ribera, Sabine Rosner, Khalifah A Salmeia, Francis W M R Schwarze

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of botany, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hugh MorrisLaboratory for Cellulose & Wood Materials, Empa-Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Ari M HietalaNorwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, Ås, Norway.
Steven JansenInstitute of Systematic Botany and Ecology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Javier RiberaLaboratory for Cellulose & Wood Materials, Empa-Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Sabine RosnerInstitute of Botany, BOKU Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Khalifah A SalmeiaLaboratory of Advanced Fibers, Empa-Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Francis W M R SchwarzeLaboratory for Cellulose & Wood Materials, Empa-Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, St. Gallen, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn trees, secondary metabolites (SMs) are essential for determining the effectiveness of defence systems against fungi and why defences are sometimes breached. Using the CODIT model (Compartmentalization of Damage/Dysfunction in Trees), we explain defence processes at the cellular level. CODIT is a highly compartmented defence system that relies on the signalling, synthesis and transport of defence compounds through a three-dimensional lattice of parenchyma against the spread of decay fungi in xylem. SCOPE: The model conceptualizes 'walls' that are pre-formed, formed during and formed after wounding events. For sapwood, SMs range in molecular size, which directly affects performance and the response times in which they can be produced. When triggered, high-molecular weight SMs such as suberin and lignin are synthesized slowly (phytoalexins), but can also be in place at the time of wounding (phytoanticipins). In contrast, low-molecular weight phenolic compounds such as flavonoids can be manufactured de novo (phytoalexins) rapidly in response to fungal colonization. De novo production of SMs can be regulated in response to fungal pathogenicity levels. The protective nature of heartwood is partly based on the level of accumulated antimicrobial SMs (phytoanticipins) during the transitionary stage into a normally dead substance. Effectiveness against fungal colonization in heartwood is largely determined by the genetics of the host.

conclusionHere we review recent advances in our understanding of the role of SMs in trees in the context of CODIT, with emphasis on the relationship between defence, carbohydrate availability and the hydraulic system.We also raise the limitations of the CODIT model and suggest its modification, encompassing other defence theory concepts. We envisage the development of a new defence system that is modular based and incorporates all components (and organs) of the tree from micro- to macro-scales.

Indexed as

TreesXylemFungiLigninLigninCODITdecay fungiheartwoodinduced systemic resistancenon-structural carbohydrate (NSC)parenchymaplant defenceplant–fungi interactionssapwoodsecondary metabolites (SMs)secondary xylemsystemic induced resistance

Identifiers

PMID31420666
PMCPMC7182590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.