Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31420623›Full record

ArticleBeijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences2019

[Retrospective study of diagnosis and treatment of renal oncocytoma].

M Qiu, Y W Zhang, Y Y Fei, C Liu, S H Deng, W He, M Lu, J Lu, X F Hou, L L Ma

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M QiuDepartment of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Y W ZhangDepartment of Urology, Taiyuan People's Hospital, Taiyuan 030001, China.
Y Y FeiDepartment of Urology, Jixi Jikuang Hospital, Jixi 158100, Heilongjiang, China.
C LiuDepartment of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
S H DengDepartment of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
W HeDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
M LuDepartment of Pathology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
J LuDepartment of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
X F HouDepartment of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
L L MaDepartment of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Peking University Third Hospital · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo summarize the experience of diagnosis and surgical treatment of renal oncocytoma, and to evaluate the surgical results based on follow-up results, in order to find the best strategy.

methodsIn the study, 21 cases with renal oncocytoma from December 2003 to April 2016 in Peking University Third Hospital were retrospectively analyzed, including 4 males, and 17 females, with 10 cases on the right side and 11 cases on the left side. Their age was between 15 to 80 years (average: 58 years). Ultrasound or CT examination after admission was conducted. Ultrasound examination showed solid nodules. CT manifestations were solid masses with enhancement, and the tumor size was between 1.5 cm to 6.5 cm (average: 3.3 cm). Of the 21 cases, 9 were located in the middle of kidney, 7 were located in the upper pole, and 5 were located in the lower pole. After preoperative examination, according to the size and location of the tumor, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy or laparoscopic nephrectomy was performed, respectively.

resultsAll the operations were successful, in which 17 cases underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (including 3 cases which were converted to open surgery), and 4 cases underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. The operation time ranged from 75 to 274 min (mean: 144 min), and the blood loss ranged from 10 to 1 000 mL (mean: 115 mL). The postoperative hospital stay time ranged from 6 to 13 d (average: 8.2 d). The pathological results were all renal oncocytoma. In the study, 17 cases were followed up while 4 cases were lost to follow-up. The follow-up time ranged from 12 to 175 months (mean: 44 months). One case died in 20 months after operation with unknown reason, and there were no recurrence or metastasis in the other 16 cases.

conclusionRenal oncocytoma is a benign tumor with good prognosis. Enhanced CT is an effective diagnostic method in assistant examination, but it is difficult to differentiate clear cell carcinoma only from the naked eye. It is worthwhile to measure CT value at different stages of the tumor by picture archiving and communication systems (PACS), and to compare with CT value of adjacent kidney tissue may improve the diagnostic efficiency of CT. Laparoscopic surgery is an effective treatment for renal oncocytoma. We recommend laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for the patients with renal oncocytoma as the best choice if conditions permit.

Indexed as

Adenoma, OxyphilicKidney NeoplasmsLaparoscopyAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Renal CellFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNephrectomyRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31420623
PMCPMC7433503
OpenAlexW2973650452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.