Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31420598›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2019

Chronic inflammation in multiple sclerosis - seeing what was always there.

Paul M Matthews

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Herbal medicines for SOD1Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul M MatthewsDepartment of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK. p.matthews@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1619-8328
UK Dementia Research Institute · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17114Medical Research Council MR/M024903/1Medical Research Council MR/N026934/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Activation of innate immune cells and other compartmentalized inflammatory cells in the brains and spinal cords of people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) and progressive MS has been well described histopathologically. However, conventional clinical MRI is largely insensitive to this inflammatory activity. The past two decades have seen the introduction of quantitative dynamic MRI scanning with contrast agents that are sensitive to the reduction in blood-brain barrier integrity associated with inflammation and to the trafficking of inflammatory myeloid cells. New MRI imaging sequences provide improved contrast for better detection of grey matter lesions. Quantitative lesion volume measures and magnetic resonance susceptibility imaging are sensitive to the activity of macrophages in the rims of white matter lesions. PET and magnetic resonance spectroscopy methods can also be used to detect contributions from innate immune activation in the brain and spinal cord. Some of these advanced research imaging methods for visualization of chronic inflammation are practical for relatively routine clinical applications. Observations made with the use of these techniques suggest ways of stratifying patients with MS to improve their care. The imaging methods also provide new tools to support the development of therapies for chronic inflammation in MS.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseHumansInflammationInflammation MediatorsMultiple SclerosisNeuroimagingInflammation Mediators

Identifiers

PMID31420598
OpenAlexW2969144267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.