Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31420516›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Large-effect flowering time mutations reveal conditionally adaptive paths through fitness landscapes in

Mark A Taylor, Amity M Wilczek, Judith L Roe, Stephen M Welch, Daniel E Runcie, Martha D Cooper, Johanna Schmitt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. A large-effect fitness trade-off across environments is explained by a single mutation affecting cold acclimation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mark A TaylorDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616; maktaylor@ucdavis.edu jschmitt@ucdavis.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2266-7917
Amity M WilczekDeep Springs College, Big Pine, CA 93513.
Judith L RoeCollege of Arts and Sciences, University of Maine at Presque Isle, Presque Isle, ME 04769.
Stephen M WelchDepartment of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506.
Daniel E RuncieDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.
Martha D CooperDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912.
Johanna SchmittDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616; maktaylor@ucdavis.edu jschmitt@ucdavis.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contrary to previous assumptions that most mutations are deleterious, there is increasing evidence for persistence of large-effect mutations in natural populations. A possible explanation for these observations is that mutant phenotypes and fitness may depend upon the specific environmental conditions to which a mutant is exposed. Here, we tested this hypothesis by growing large-effect flowering time mutants of

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalMutationSelection, GeneticArabidopsisBiological EvolutionComputational BiologyFlowersGene Expression ProfilingGenetic Association StudiesGenotypePhenotypeSeasonsTranscriptomebranchingfitness landscapeflowering timemutationnatural selection

Identifiers

PMID31420516
PMCPMC6731683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.