Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31420497›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2020

Experimental Multicenter and Multivendor Evaluation of the Performance of PET Radiomic Features Using 3-Dimensionally Printed Phantom Inserts.

Elisabeth Pfaehler, Joyce van Sluis, Bram B J Merema, Peter van Ooijen, Ralph C M Berendsen, Floris H P van Velden, Ronald Boellaard

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Quantitative classification and radiomics of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A proof of concept study ofScientific reports · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review on radiomic analysis inCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elisabeth PfaehlerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands e.a.g.pfaehler@umcg.nl.
Joyce van SluisDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Bram B J MeremaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Peter van OoijenDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ralph C M BerendsenDepartment of Medical Physics, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Floris H P van VeldenSection of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; and.
Ronald BoellaardDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLZuyderland Medisch Centrum · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sensitivity of radiomic features to several confounding factors, such as reconstruction settings, makes clinical use challenging. To investigate the impact of harmonized image reconstructions on feature consistency, a multicenter phantom study was performed using 3-dimensionally printed phantom inserts reflecting realistic tumor shapes and heterogeneity uptakes.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingPrinting, Three-DimensionalPositron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography18F-FDG PET/CT radiomic featuresfeature harmonizationimage reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID31420497
PMCPMC7067530
OpenAlexW2969118048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.