Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31420382›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Psychometrics properties of the Team Interaction Scale and influencing factors of team interaction of tertiary hospital physicians in China: a cross-sectional study.

Wenwen Song, Honghe Li, Ning Ding, Weiyue Zhao, Lin Shi, Deliang Wen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wenwen SongInstitute for International Health Professions Education and Research, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Honghe LiInstitute for International Health Professions Education and Research, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Ning DingInstitute for International Health Professions Education and Research, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Weiyue ZhaoInstitute for International Health Professions Education and Research, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Lin ShiMedical Insurance Department, Shenyang Tenth People's Hospital, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Deliang WenInstitute for International Health Professions Education and Research, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4038-3849

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo administer a cross-cultural adaptation of the Team Interaction Scale (TIS), test its psychometric properties and investigate influencing factors of team interactions in a physician population in Chinese tertiary hospitals.

designCross-sectional survey. SETTINGS: Two rounds of surveys, a pilot and a large sampling survey, were conducted in two and nine tertiary hospitals, respectively, in Liaoning Province, China.

participantsIn the pilot survey, 363 of 390 physicians sampled were included in the analysis, resulting in an effective response rate of 93.08%. In the large sampling survey, the effective response rate was 89.10% (3653 of 4100 physicians). OUTCOME MEASURES: The TIS and a short version of a burn-out scale were administrated to assess the physician's team interaction and burn-out. Psychometric properties of TIS were tested by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and internal consistency analysis. Gender, age, discipline, education level, professional title, hospital scale and burn-out were explored as influencing factors with independent sample

resultsBased on CFA, a 17-item modified scale was developed following the pilot survey. In the large sampling survey, EFA was conducted with half of the samples, producing six dimensions: 'Communication', 'Coordination', 'Mutual help', 'Team goals', 'Work norms' and 'Cohesion and conflict resolution'. Fit of the modified model was confirmed by CFA with the other half of the samples (root mean square error of approximation=0.067, Comparative Fit Index=0.98, Normed Fit Index=0.97, Goodness of Fit Index=0.94, Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index=0.92). A high Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.98 demonstrated reliability of the modified scale. The Team Interaction Score was significantly lower in younger physicians, in men, in paediatricians and in physicians from larger-scale tertiary hospitals. Team Interaction Scores were negatively associated with burn-out.

conclusionsThe adapted TIS, containing 17 items and six dimensions, was reliable and valid for Chinese tertiary hospital physicians. To address physician burn-out, team interaction should be highlighted.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalInterprofessional RelationsPatient Care TeamPsychometricsBehavior Rating ScaleChinaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPhysiciansReproducibility of ResultsTertiary Care Centersburnoutchinesephysicianscaleteam interaction

Identifiers

PMID31420382
PMCPMC6701648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.