Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31419948›Full record

SynthesisBMC cardiovascular disorders2019

Critical appraisal of international guidelines for the prevention and treatment of pregnancy-associated venous thromboembolism: a systematic review.

Jie Zheng, Qinchang Chen, Jing Fu, Yanling Lu, Tianjun Han, Ping He

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Risk of Thrombosis Around Pregnancy: Where Do We Stand?Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jie ZhengDepartment of Obstetrics, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Qinchang ChenDepartment of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jing FuDepartment of Obstetrics, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yanling LuDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, NO.402, Ren Min Middle Road, Yue Xiu District, Guangzhou, 510180, China.
Tianjun HanDepartment of Obstetrics, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ping HeDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, NO.402, Ren Min Middle Road, Yue Xiu District, Guangzhou, 510180, China. hepingin2018@163.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7931-005X
Guangzhou Medical University · CNGuangzhou Women and Children Medical Center · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnancy-associated Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of the most common causes of maternal morbidity and mortality in developed countries. In this study, we aimed to systematically review and critical appraisal of guidelines to compare the recommendations in pregnancy-associated VTE.

methodsGuidelines in English between January 1, 2009 and November 31, 2018 were searched using Medline via PubMed, as well as the guidelines' website. The guidelines containing the recommendations on pregnancy-associated VTE were included. Through the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument, three reviewers appraised the quality of the included guidelines. The recommendations were also summarized and compared to analyze the consistency.

resultsFifteen guidelines from 13 organizations were included. Ten guidelines from nine organizations, namely, ACCP, ANZJOG, ASH, Australia, ESC, Korea, RCOG, SASTH, SOCC, were regarded as "strongly recommended for use in practice". Most of the included guidelines scored low in lower scores in domain 3 (Rigor of development) and domain 6 (Editorial independence). Recommendations on prevention are contained in ten guidelines while treatment are included in seven. The main conflicting recommendations were mainly at the anticoagulant choice for prevention on pregnant women and prevention after cesarean section. The duration of VTE treatment in pregnant women was also controversial.

conclusionsIn summary, the quality of pregnancy-associated VTE guidelines varied widely, especially in Rigor of development and Editorial independence. Recommendations were inconsistent both in prevention and treatment across guidelines. Increased efforts are required to provide high-quality evidence specific to the pregnancy population. Guideline developers should also pay more attention to methodological quality.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAnticoagulantsConsensusDrug Administration ScheduleEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy Complications, CardiovascularRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeVenous ThromboembolismAnticoagulantsPregnancyPreventionTreatmentVenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID31419948
PMCPMC6698012
OpenAlexW2967018189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.