ReviewYearbook of medical informatics2019
Artificial Intelligence in Health: New Opportunities, Challenges, and Practical Implications.
Review in Yearbook of medical informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Social Health: A Narrative Review of Uses, Advantages, Challenges, and Future Directions.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Principles and Practices of Community Engagement in AI for Population Health: Formative Qualitative Study of the AI for Diabetes Prediction and Prevention Project.Journal of participatory medicine · 2025Article
- Patients' Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Acceptance, Challenges, and Use in Medical Care: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Acceptance and Adoption of Artificial Intelligence Among Cancer Survivors Seeking Information: A Literature Review.Journal of patient experience · 2025Article
- Unveiling the Influence of AI on Advancements in Respiratory Care: Narrative Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2024Review
- Existing Barriers Faced by and Future Design Recommendations for Direct-to-Consumer Health Care Artificial Intelligence Apps: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Patients' Views on AI for Risk Prediction in Shared Decision-Making for Knee Replacement Surgery: Qualitative Interview Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Accelerating UN Sustainable Development Goals with AI-Driven Technologies: A Systematic Literature Review of Women's Healthcare.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Precision Health Through Lenses of Ethics and Social Determinants of Health: Protocol for a State-of-the-Art Literature Review.JMIR research protocols · 2023Article
- Explainability agreement between dermatologists and five visual explanations techniques in deep neural networks for melanoma AI classification.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Multi-omics and machine learning for the prevention and management of female reproductive health.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- Article
- A bibliometric analysis of the application of artificial intelligence to advance individualized diagnosis and treatment of critical illness.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Spontaneously generated online patient experience data - how and why is it being used in health research: an umbrella scoping review.BMC medical research methodology · 2022Article
- Early Warning and Clinical Epidemiological Characteristics of Lung Injury in the Treatment of InfectiousComputational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- Economical Utilization of Health Information with Learning Healthcare System Data Commons.Perspectives in health information managemen · 2022Article
- How do people think about the implementation of speech and video recognition technology in emergency medical practice?PloS one · 2022Article
- Social media can have an impact on how we manage and investigate the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2020Article
- Review
- [Computer-assisted skin cancer diagnosis : Is it time for artificial intelligence in clinical practice?]Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo summarise the state of the art during the year 2018 in consumer health informatics and education, with a special emphasis on the special topic of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) Yearbook for 2019: "Artificial intelligence in health: new opportunities, challenges, and practical implications".
methodsWe conducted a systematic search of articles published in PubMed using a predefined set of queries that identified 99 potential articles for review. These articles were screened according to topic relevance and 14 were selected for consideration as best paper candidates. The 14 papers were then presented to a panel of international experts for full paper review and scoring. Three papers that received the highest score were discussed in a consensus meeting and were agreed upon as best papers on artificial intelligence in health for patients and consumers in the year 2018.
resultsOnly a small number of 2018 papers reported Artificial Intelligence (AI) research for patients and consumers. No studies were found on AI applications designed specifically for patients or consumers, nor were there studies that elicited patient and consumer input on AI. Currently, the most common use of AI for patients and consumers lies in secondary analysis of social media data (e.g., online discussion forums). In particular, the three best papers shared a common methodology of using data-driven algorithms (such as text mining, topic modelling, Latent Dirichlet allocation modelling), combined with insight-led approaches (e.g., visualisation, qualitative analysis and manual review), to uncover patient and consumer experiences of health and illness in online communities.
conclusionsWhile discussion remains active on how AI could 'revolutionise' healthcare delivery, there is a lack of direction and evidence on how AI could actually benefit patients and consumers. Perhaps instead of primarily focusing on data and algorithms, researchers should engage with patients and consumers early in the AI research agenda to ensure we are indeed asking the right questions, and that important use cases and critical contexts are identified together with patients and consumers. Without a clear understanding on why patients and consumers need AI in the first place, or how AI could support individuals with their healthcare needs, it is difficult to imagine the kinds of AI applications that would have meaningful and sustainable impact on individual daily lives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.