Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31419819›Full record

ArticleYearbook of medical informatics2019

Human Factors and Sociotechnical Issues.

Sylvia Pelayo, Yalini Senathirajah, Section Editors for the IMIA Yearbook Section on Human Factors and Organizational Issues

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Yearbook of medical informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sylvia PelayoUniversity of Lille, INSERM, CHU Lille, CIC-IT 1403/Evalab - Centre d'Investigation Clinique, EA 2694, F-59000 Lille, France.
Yalini SenathirajahUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Dept. of Biomedical Informatics, Pittsburgh, USA.
Section Editors for the IMIA Yearbook Section on Human Factors and Organizational Issues

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo summarize significant research contributions on human factors (HF) and organizational issues in medical informatics published in 2018.

methodsAn extensive search using PubMed/Medline and Web of Science

resultsThe four selected best papers are excellent contributions to the HF literature: they show the added value of HF studies by providing nice illustrated and rigorous interventions.

conclusionHF interventions are known to have great potential to contribute to efficient HIT design, but the interventions still face challenges in successfully demonstrating their value to the main stakeholders of the healthcare domain. There is a need to strengthen the demand for high-quality HF studies by increasing awareness among powerful stakeholders of the value of high-quality HF studies.

Indexed as

ErgonomicsMedical InformaticsHumansPatient SafetyUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID31419819
PMCPMC6697518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.