ArticleTranslational oncology2019
Influence of BRCA1 Germline Mutations in the Somatic Mutational Burden of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
Article in Translational oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- BRCA1 mutation promotes sprouting angiogenesis in inflammatory cancer-associated fibroblast of triple-negative breast cancer.Cell death discovery · 2024Article
- Current State of Knowledge on the Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Treatment: Approaches, Efficacy, and Challenges.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2022Review
- Follow-up of tissue genomics in BRCA1/2 carriers who underwent prophylactic surgeries.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2021Article
- Impact ofCancers · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The majority of the hereditary triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) are associated with BRCA1 germline mutations. Nevertheless, the understanding of the role of BRCA1 deficiency in the TNBC tumorigenesis is poor. In this sense, we performed whole-exome sequencing of triplet samples (leucocyte, tumor, and normal-adjacent breast tissue) for 10 cases of early-onset TNBC, including 5 hereditary (with BRCA1 germline pathogenic mutation) and 5 sporadic (with no BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline pathogenic mutations), for assessing the somatic mutation repertoire. Protein-affecting somatic mutations were identified for both mammary tissues, and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis was used to investigate gene interactions. BRCA1 and RAD51C somatic promoter methylation in tumor samples was also investigated by bisulfite sequencing. Sporadic tumors had higher proportion of driver mutations (≥25% allele frequency) than BRCA1 hereditary tumors, whereas no difference was detected in the normal breast samples. Distinct gene networks were obtained from the driver genes in each group. The Cancer Genome Atlas data analysis of TNBC classified as hereditary and sporadic reinforced our findings. The data presented here indicate that in the absence of BRCA1 germline mutations, a higher number of driver mutations are required for tumor development and that different defective processes are operating in the tumorigenesis of hereditary and sporadic TNBC in young women.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.