Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31419570›Full record

ArticleClinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association2020

Motility Patterns Following Esophageal Pharmacologic Provocation With Amyl Nitrite or Cholecystokinin During High-Resolution Manometry Distinguish Idiopathic vs Opioid-Induced Type 3 Achalasia.

Arash Babaei, Sadaf Shad, Benson T Massey

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Achalasia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Dysphagia: Novel and Emerging Diagnostic Modalities.Gastroenterology clinics of North America · 2021
    Review
  5. Chicago classification version 4.0Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arash BabaeiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado. Electronic address: babaeia@njhealth.org.
Sadaf ShadDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Benson T MasseyDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Medical College of Wisconsin · USNational Jewish Health · US

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR001438 · NCATS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI WIDLANSKY, MICHAEL E · 2015 to 2024
$2.9M
Clinical and Translational Science AwardKL2TR000056 · NCATS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI SHAKER, REZA NONE · 2012 to 2015
$609k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000056NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001438
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsIn some patients, the type 3 achalasia (A3) motor pattern may be an effect of chronic use of high-dose opioids. No motor findings have been identified to differentiate opioid-induced A3 (OA3) from idiopathic A3 (IA3). We investigated whether OA3 could be distinguished from IA3 on the basis of differences in esophageal motor responses to amyl nitrite, cholecystokinin, or atropine.

methodsWe performed a retrospective study of patients who received pharmacologic provocation during esophageal high-resolution manometry from 2007 through 2017 at a tertiary referral center. We identified 26 patients with IA3 (9 women; mean age, 68 ± 13 years) and 24 patients with OA3 (15 women; mean age, 59 ± 10 years). We compared pressure topography metrics during deglutition and after administration of amyl nitrite, cholecystokinin, or atropine between patients with OA3 vs IA3.

resultsAmyl nitrite induced a similar relaxation response in both groups, but the rebound contraction of the lower esophageal sphincter during amyl nitrite recovery, and the paradoxical esophageal contraction during the first phase of cholecystokinin response, were both significantly attenuated in patients with OA3. The second phase of cholecystokinin response in patients with OA3 was 100% relaxation, when present, in contrast to only 26% of patients with IA3. There was no significant difference between groups in inhibition of lower esophageal sphincter tone or esophageal body contractility by cholinergic receptor blockade.

conclusionsNearly half of patients with an A3 pattern of dysmotility are chronic, daily users of opioids with manometry patterns indistinguishable from those of patients with IA3. Patients with OA3 differ from patients with IA3 in responses to amyl nitrite and cholecystokinin. These findings might be used to identify patients with dysmotility resulting from opioid use.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidEsophageal AchalasiaAgedAmyl NitriteCholecystokininEsophageal Sphincter, LowerFemaleHumansManometryMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAmyl NitriteAnalgesics, OpioidCholecystokininDysphagiaHRMLESNarcoticsPeristalsis

Identifiers

PMID31419570
PMCPMC7015768
OpenAlexW2966959510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.