ReviewActa biomaterialia2019
Biomechanics of aortic wall failure with a focus on dissection and aneurysm: A review.
Review in Acta biomaterialia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational modeling of tissue damage preceding aortic dissection: a coupled biphasic and reactive viscoelastic framework.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2026Article
- Reduced mechanical strength correlates with decreased elastin content in aortic intima-media tissue: association with dissection in human ascending aortas.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Controlled intramural fluid injection to quantify propensity to thoracic aortic dissection.Research square · 2026Article
- Increased medial collagen enhances aortic resilience against mural delamination from hydraulic fracturing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Controlled intramural fluid injection to quantify propensity to thoracic aortic dissection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Predicting curvature evolution on biological surfaces from clinical imaging-derived area dilation: a closed-form interpretable framework.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Development and internal validation of a computed tomography angiography‑based prediction model for acute rupture in type A aortic dissection.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Aortic dissection as a disease of vascular wall homeostasis: integrating vasa vasorum-inflammation-metabolism axis for mechanistic insight and clinical translation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Obesity: An Underlying Risk for Acute Aortic Dissection.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Enhancing aortic anastomotic integrity: ex vivo evaluation of reinforcement techniques using Teflon-felt sandwich with mattress sutures.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2025Article
- A three-dimensional computational study of critical pressures of dissection propagation in the aorta.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2025Article
- CCDC80 Protects against Aortic Dissection and Rupture by Maintaining the Contractile Smooth Muscle Cell Phenotype.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Microstructural remodeling under single fiber tensional homeostasis recreates distinctive ex vivo mechanical behavior of arteries.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2025Article
- Mechanisms of aortic dissection: From pathological changes to experimental andProgress in materials science · 2025Article
- Protective biomechanical and histological changes in the false lumen wall in chronic type B aortic dissection.JTCVS open · 2025Article
- Right coronary sinus of Valsalva pseudoaneurysm after a motorcycle accident: A case report.Medicine · 2025Article
- Democratizing biomedical simulation through automated model discovery and a universal material subroutine.Computational mechanics · 2025Article
- Case Report: preoperative prediction of aneurysm rupture site using aortic morphological and biomechanical analysis validated by intraoperative imaging.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Biomechanical stress analysis of Type-A aortic dissection at pre-dissection, post-dissection, and post-repair states.Computers in biology and medicine · 2025Article
- Biomechanics of soft biological tissues and organs, mechanobiology, homeostasis and modelling.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Review
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aortic dissections and aortic aneurysms are fatal events characterized by structural changes to the aortic wall. The maximum diameter criterion, typically used for aneurysm rupture risk estimations, has been challenged by more sophisticated biomechanically motivated models in the past. Although these models are very helpful for the clinicians in decision-making, they do not attempt to capture material failure. Following a short overview of the microstructure of the aorta, we analyze the failure mechanisms involved in the dissection and rupture by considering also traumatic rupture. We continue with a literature review of experimental studies relevant to quantify tissue strength. More specifically, we summarize more extensively uniaxial tensile, bulge inflation and peeling tests, and we also specify trouser, direct tension and in-plane shear tests. Finally we analyze biomechanically motivated models to predict rupture risk. Based on the findings of the reviewed studies and the rather large variations in tissue strength, we propose that an appropriate material failure criterion for aortic tissues should also reflect the microstructure in order to be effective. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Aortic dissections and aortic aneurysms are fatal events characterized by structural changes to the aortic wall. Despite the advances in medical, biomedical and biomechanical research, the mortality rates of aneurysms and dissections remain high. The present review article summarizes experimental studies that quantify the aortic wall strength and it discusses biomechanically motivated models to predict rupture risk. We identified contradictory observations and a large variation within and between data sets, which may be due to biological variations, different sample sizes, differences in experimental protocols, etc. Based on the findings of the reviewed literature and the rather large variations in tissue strength, it is proposed that an appropriate criterion for aortic failure should also reflect the microstructure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.