Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31419298›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2020

WHO grade has no prognostic value in the pediatric high-grade glioma included in the HERBY trial.

Pascale Varlet, Gwénaël Le Teuff, Marie-Cécile Le Deley, Felice Giangaspero, Christine Haberler, Thomas S Jacques, Dominique Figarella-Branger, Torsten Pietsch, Felipe Andreiuolo, Christophe Deroulers and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01390948 (A Phase II Open-Label, Randomized, Multi-Centre Comparative Study Of Bevacizumab-Based Therapy In Paediatric Patients With Newly Diagnosed Supratentorial, Infratentorial Cerebellar, or Peduncular High-Grade Glioma), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01390948 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase II Open-Label, Randomized, Multi-Centre Comparative Study Of Bevacizumab-Based Therapy In Paediatric Patients With Newly Diagnosed Supratentorial, Infratentorial Cerebellar, or Peduncular High-Grade Glioma

TypeinterventionalSponsorHoffmann-La RocheRan2011 to 2020Enrolled124ConditionsHigh Grade GliomaArmsBevacizumab, Radiotherapy, Temozolomide (TMZ)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Molecular and Pathological Features of Paediatric High-Grade Gliomas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Exploring the association of glioma tumor residuals from incongruent [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Clinical features and outcomes of pediatric intracranial gliomas: results from single center's 226 cases and corroborated with SEER database.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023
    Article
  13. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Cancers · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Pascale VarletDepartment of Neuropathology, Sainte-Anne Hospital, University Hospital Group (GHU), Paris, France.
Gwénaël Le TeuffGustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France.
Marie-Cécile Le DeleyUniversity of Paris Saclay, University Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France.
Felice GiangasperoDepartment of Neuropathology, Sainte-Anne Hospital, University Hospital Group (GHU), Paris, France.
Christine HaberlerInstitute of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Thomas S JacquesUniversity College London (UCL) Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health and Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Dominique Figarella-BrangerTimone Hospital, Marseille, France.
Torsten PietschDepartment of Neuropathology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Felipe AndreiuoloDepartment of Neuropathology, Sainte-Anne Hospital, University Hospital Group (GHU), Paris, France.
Christophe DeroulersImaging and Modeling in Neurobiology and Oncology (IMNC) Laboratory, Paris Diderot University, Paris, France.
Tim JaspanDepartment of Radiology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Chris JonesInstitute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Jacques GrillJoint Research Unit 8203, Gustave Roussy Institute and University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 23536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO) adult glioma grading system is questionable in pediatric high-grade gliomas (pHGGs), which are biologically distinct from adult HGGs. We took advantage of the neuropathological review data obtained during one of the largest prospective randomized pHGG trials, namely HERBY (NCT01390948), to address this issue in children with newly diagnosed non-brainstem HGG.

methodsHGG diagnosis was confirmed by pre-randomization, real-time central pathology review using WHO 2007 criteria, followed by a consensus review blinded to clinical factors and outcomes. We evaluated association between WHO 2007 grade and other clinical/radiological/biological characteristics and the prognostic value of WHO 2007 grade, midline location, and selected biomarkers (Ki-67 index/Olig2/CD34/EGFR/p53/H3F3A K27M mutation) on overall survival.

resultsReal-time central neuropathological review was feasible in a multicenter study, with a mean time of 2.4 days, and led to the rejection of HGG diagnosis in 20 of 163 cases (12.3%). The different grading criteria and resulting WHO grade were not significantly associated with overall survival in the entire population (n = 118) or in midline and non-midline subgroups. H3F3A K27M mutation was significantly associated with poor outcome. No significant prognostic value was observed for grade, even after regrading H3F3A K27M-mutated midline glioma as grade IV (WHO 2016). Midline location and a high Ki-67 index (≥20%) were associated with poor outcome (P = 0.004 and P = 0.04, respectively). A 10% increase in Ki-67 index was associated with a hazard ratio of 1.53 (95% CI: 1.27-1.83; P < 0.0001).

conclusionOur findings suggest that WHO grade III versus IV has no prognostic value in pediatric HGG.

Indexed as

AdolescentAntineoplastic AgentsBevacizumabBrain NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyChildChild, PreschoolClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicDatasets as TopicFemaleGliomaHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicNeoplasm GradingPrognosisAntineoplastic AgentsBevacizumabTemozolomidegrading criteriahigh-grade gliomaKi-67pediatric

Identifiers

PMID31419298
PMCPMC6954414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.