Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31419257›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2019

Micro-costing and a cost-consequence analysis of the 'Girls Active' programme: A cluster randomised controlled trial.

Joanna M Charles, Deirdre M Harrington, Melanie J Davies, Charlotte L Edwardson, Trish Gorely, Danielle H Bodicoat, Kamlesh Khunti, Lauren B Sherar, Thomas Yates, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Joanna M CharlesCentre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5306-3887
Deirdre M HarringtonDiabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Melanie J DaviesDiabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Charlotte L EdwardsonDiabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Trish GorelyDepartment of Nursing, School of Health, Social Care and Life Sciences, University of the Highlands and Islands, Inverness, United Kingdom.
Danielle H BodicoatDiabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Kamlesh KhuntiDiabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Lauren B SherarSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom.
Thomas YatesDiabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Rhiannon Tudor EdwardsCentre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health PHR/13/90/30
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical inactivity has been identified as a leading risk factor for premature mortality globally, and adolescents, in particular, have low physical activity levels. Schools have been identified as a setting to tackle physical inactivity. Economic evidence of school-based physical activity programmes is limited, and the costs of these programmes are not always collected in full. This paper describes a micro-costing and cost-consequence analysis of the 'Girls Active' secondary school-based programme as part of a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT). Micro-costing and cost-consequence analyses were conducted using bespoke cost diaries and questionnaires to collect programme delivery information. Outcomes for the cost-consequence analysis included health-related quality of life measured by the Child Health Utility-9D (CHU-9D), primary care General Practitioner (GP) and school-based (school nurse and school counsellor) service use as part of a cluster RCT of the 'Girls Active' programme. Overall, 1,752 secondary pupils were recruited and a complete case sample of 997 participants (Intervention n = 570, Control n = 427) was used for the cost-consequence analysis. The micro-costing analysis demonstrated that, depending upon how the programme was delivered, 'Girls Active' costs ranged from £1,054 (£2 per pupil, per school year) to £3,489 (£7 per pupil, per school year). The least costly option was to absorb 'Girls Active' strictly within curriculum hours. The analysis demonstrated no effect for the programme for the three main outcomes of interest (health-related quality of life, physical activity and service use).Micro-costing analyses demonstrated the costs of delivering the 'Girls Active' programme, addressing a gap in the United Kingdom (UK) literature regarding economic evidence from school-based physical activity programmes. This paper provides recommendations for those gathering cost and service use data in school settings to supplement validated and objective measures, furthering economic research in this field. Trial registration: -ISRCTN, ISRCTN10688342.

Indexed as

Child HealthCost-Benefit AnalysisAdolescentAdolescent HealthChildExerciseFemaleHealth PromotionHumansOrganizations, NonprofitProgram EvaluationQuality of LifeSchoolsSedentary BehaviorSportsStudents

Identifiers

PMID31419257
PMCPMC6697369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.