Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31419256›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Reference gene selection for quantitative gene expression analysis in black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens).

Zhenghui Gao, Wenhui Deng, Fen Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Black Soldier FlyCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhenghui GaoHubei Insect Resources Utilization and Sustainable Pest Management Key Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Wenhui DengHubei Insect Resources Utilization and Sustainable Pest Management Key Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Fen ZhuHubei International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Waste Conversion by Insects, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3909-0923
Huazhong Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hermetia illucens is an important resource insect for the conversion of organic waste. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) is the primary tool of gene expression analysis and a core technology of molecular biology research. Reference genes are essential for qPCR analysis; however, a stability analysis of H. illucens reference genes has not yet been carried out. To find suitable reference genes for normalizing gene expression data, the stability of eight housekeeping genes (including ATP6V1A, RPL8, EF1, Tubulin, TBP, GAPDH, Actin and RP49) was investigated under both biotic (developmental stages, tissues and sex) and abiotic (heavy metals, food, antibiotics) conditions. Gene expression data were analysed by geNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper, and ΔCt programs. A set of specific reference genes was recommended for each experimental condition using the results of RefFinder synthesis analysis. This study offers a solid foundation for further studies of the molecular biology of H. illucens.

Indexed as

AnimalsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenes, EssentialGenes, InsectMaleReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReference StandardsSimuliidae

Identifiers

PMID31419256
PMCPMC6697329
OpenAlexW2968867484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.