Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31419254›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Faecalibacterium diversity in dairy cow milk.

Keith W Savin, Jody Zawadzki, Martin J Auldist, Jianghui Wang, Doris Ram, Simone Rochfort, Benjamin G Cocks

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Keith W SavinAgriBio Centre, Agriculture Victoria Research, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8347-0320
Jody ZawadzkiAgriBio Centre, Agriculture Victoria Research, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
Martin J AuldistAgriculture Victoria Research, Ellinbank, Victoria, Australia.
Jianghui WangAgriBio Centre, Agriculture Victoria Research, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
Doris RamAgriBio Centre, Agriculture Victoria Research, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
Simone RochfortAgriBio Centre, Agriculture Victoria Research, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
Benjamin G CocksAgriBio Centre, Agriculture Victoria Research, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
Agriculture Victoria · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bacterial species, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, beneficial to humans and animals and found in mammalian and avian gut, is also occasionally found in dairy cow milk. It is one of the butyrate-producing bacteria of the colon, has anti-inflammatory properties and its abundance in the gut is negatively correlated with obesity in humans. Several strains differing in their functional capability, have been identified. It is important therefore, milk being a potential source of F. prausnitzii as a novel probiotic, to investigate the diversity of this species in bovine milk. Using 16s rRNA gene amplicons we find 292 different dereplicated Faecalibacterium-related amplicons in a herd of 21 dairy cows. The distribution of the 20 most abundant amplicons with >97% identity to a Greengenes OTU varies from cow to cow. Clustering of the 292 pooled sequences from all cows at 99.6% identity finds 4 likely Faecalibacterium phylotypes with >98.5% identity to an F. prausnitzii reference sequence. Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis shows these phylotypes are distinct from 34 other species from the Ruminococcaceae family and displaying the sequence clusters as a network illustrates how each cluster is composed of sequences from multiple cows. We conclude there are several phylotypes of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (the only species so far defined for the genus) in this dairy herd with cows being inoculated with a mixture of several strains from a common source. We conclude that not only can Faecalibacterium be detected in dairy cow milk (as noted by others) but that there exist multiple different strains in the milk of a dairy herd. Therefore milk, as an alternative to faeces, offers the opportunity of discovering new strains with potential probiotic application.

Indexed as

ProbioticsAnimalsCattleDNA, BacterialFaecalibacteriumFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMilkPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID31419254
PMCPMC6697359
OpenAlexW2968844317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.