Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31419241›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

The factor structure and construct validity of the parent-reported Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits among school-aged children and adolescents.

Satomi Yoshida, Masaki Adachi, Michio Takahashi, Nobuya Takanyanagi, Sayura Yasuda, Hirokazu Osada, Kazuhiko Nakamura

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Allostatic load in children: The cost of empathic concern.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Satomi YoshidaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8168-4672
Masaki AdachiResearch Center for Child Mental Development, Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki University, Aomori, Japan.
Michio TakahashiResearch Center for Child Mental Development, Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki University, Aomori, Japan.
Nobuya TakanyanagiFaculty of Human Studies, Aichi Toho University, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Sayura YasudaResearch Center for Child Mental Development, Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki University, Aomori, Japan.
Hirokazu OsadaDepartment of Psychology, School of Human Sciences, Senshu University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuhiko NakamuraDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan.
Hirosaki University · JPAichi Toho University · JPSenshu University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we assessed the factor structure and construct validity of the parent-reported Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits (ICU) among school-aged children and adolescents, aged 6 to 15 years, in a community setting in Japan (n = 10,936). We investigated 15 models that have been reported in previous studies and used confirmatory factor analyses to determine a model that might actually be the best-fit among these. We then examined the correlations between the score of ICU and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in the best fit model and the three-factor bifactor (3FBF) model with the original ICU through cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis to determine the concurrent and predictive validity of the ICU. The results showed that the best-fit model was the two-factor bifactor (2FBF) model with a revised version of the ICU with 12 items, excluding all but one item of unemotional factors. The cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis showed that higher general callous-unemotional factor scores, callousness and uncaring specific factor scores were significantly associated with a higher level of conduct problems and a lower level of prosocial behaviors in the SDQ. These tendencies were shown both in the 2FBF model with the revised version of the ICU and the 3FBF model with the original ICU. We conclude that the 2FBF model was useful for school-aged community samples, as it predicts increases in conduct problems and decreases in prosocial behavior with fewer items than the 3FBF model.

Indexed as

Models, PsychologicalParentsAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorChildChild BehaviorConduct DisorderCross-Sectional StudiesEmpathyFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansJapanLongitudinal StudiesMalePersonality Inventory

Identifiers

PMID31419241
PMCPMC6697337
OpenAlexW2969191212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.