Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31418918›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2020

Fast multi-component analysis using a joint sparsity constraint for MR fingerprinting.

Martijn Nagtegaal, Peter Koken, Thomas Amthor, Mariya Doneva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Simultaneous Bilateral TJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Improved myelin water imaging using BImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Martijn NagtegaalDepartment of Quantitative Imaging, Technical University Delft, Delft, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6563-865X
Peter KokenPhilips Research, Hamburg, Germany.
Thomas AmthorPhilips Research, Hamburg, Germany.
Mariya DonevaPhilips Research, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop an efficient algorithm for multi-component analysis of magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) data without making a priori assumptions about the exact number of tissues or their relaxation properties.

methodsDifferent tissues or components within a voxel are potentially separable in MRF because of their distinct signal evolutions. The observed signal evolution in each voxel can be described as a linear combination of the signals for each component with a non-negative weight. An assumption that only a small number of components are present in the measured field of view is usually imposed in the interpretation of multi-component data. In this work, a joint sparsity constraint is introduced to utilize this additional prior knowledge in the multi-component analysis of MRF data. A new algorithm combining joint sparsity and non-negativity constraints is proposed and compared to state-of-the-art multi-component MRF approaches in simulations and brain MRF scans of 11 healthy volunteers.

resultsSimulations and in vivo measurements show reduced noise in the estimated tissue fraction maps compared to previously proposed methods. Applying the proposed algorithm to the brain data resulted in 4 or 5 components, which could be attributed to different brain structures, consistent with previous multi-component MRF publications.

conclusionsThe proposed algorithm is faster than previously proposed methods for multi-component MRF and the simulations suggest improved accuracy and precision of the estimated weights. The results are easier to interpret compared to voxel-wise methods, which combined with the improved speed is an important step toward clinical evaluation of multi-component MRF.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsBayes TheoremBrainComputer SimulationHealthy VolunteersHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLeast-Squares AnalysisModels, TheoreticalNeuroimagingPhantoms, Imagingjoint sparsity constraintMR fingerprintingmulti-component analysisNNLSpartial volume effectSparsity Promoting Iterative Joint NNLS (SPIJN)

Identifiers

PMID31418918
PMCPMC6899479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.