Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31418717›Full record

Observational studyThe journal of international advanced otology2019

Does Asymmetric Hearing Loss Affect the Ability to Understand in Noisy Environments?

Rafael Barona, Juan Antonio Vizcaino, Claudio Krstulovic, Luz Barona, Carmen Comeche, Jose Montalt, Mercedes Ubeda, Carolina Polo

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The journal of international advanced otology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rafael BaronaDepartment of Otolaryngology, Barona Clinic, Valencia, Spain.
Juan Antonio VizcainoDepartment of Otolaryngology, Barona Clinic, Valencia, Spain.
Claudio KrstulovicDepartment of Otolaryngology, Barona Clinic, Valencia, Spain.
Luz BaronaDepartment of Otolaryngology, Barona Clinic, Valencia, Spain.
Carmen ComecheDepartment of Otolaryngology, Barona Clinic, Valencia, Spain.
Jose MontaltDepartment of Otolaryngology, Barona Clinic, Valencia, Spain.
Mercedes UbedaDepartment of Otolaryngology, Barona Clinic, Valencia, Spain.
Carolina PoloValencia Catholic University Saint Vincent Martyr, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to determine whether, in asymmetric hearing loss, the presence of an ear with a better or worse hearing threshold is related to either better or worse speech-in-noise (SiN) intelligibility. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 618 subjects with different degrees of hearing loss were evaluated for their ability to understand SiN. A stepwise forward logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors that affect performance. The influencing factors of very high or very low performance were determined.

resultsAge, especially after 70 years of age, and hearing loss, especially from moderate hearing loss, negatively influence SiN intelligibility. Remarkably high intelligibility was identified in subjects with a contralateral ear presenting a better auditory threshold.

conclusionAlthough age and hearing loss are known factors that affect SiN intelligibility, the presence of a healthy contralateral ear is presented as the first description of preservation of SiN hearing ability.

Indexed as

NoiseAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAudiometry, Pure-ToneAuditory ThresholdComprehensionFemaleHearing LossHumansMaleMiddle AgedSpeech IntelligibilityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31418717
PMCPMC6750784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.