ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2019
From Information Seekers to Innovators: Qualitative Analysis Describing Experiences of the Second Generation of E-Patients.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Making patient experience actionable: applying importance-performance analysis to guide improvements in Swedish healthcare.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Moderators' Experiences of the Safety and Effectiveness of Patient Engagement in an Asthma Online Health Community: Exploratory Qualitative Interview Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Person-Centered Web-Based Mobile Health System (Symptoms) for Reporting Symptoms in COVID-19 Vaccinated Individuals: Observational Study of System, Users, and Symptoms.JMIR formative research · 2024Observational
- Why publish? An interview study exploring patient innovators' reasons for and experiences of scientific publishing.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- A rocky road but worth the drive: A longitudinal qualitative study of patient innovators and researchers cocreating research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
- Empowered patients and informal care-givers as partners?-a survey study of healthcare professionals' perceptions.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Adolescent pursuit of health information online during the COVID-19 pandemic: The roles played by eHealth literacy and psychological distress.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2023Article
- Meeting the Burden of Self-management: Qualitative Study Investigating the Empowering Behaviors of Patients and Informal Caregivers.Journal of participatory medicine · 2022Article
- Patient lead users experience of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study.BMJ open · 2022Article
- What I have learnt from helping thousands of people taper off antidepressants and other psychotropic medications.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2021Review
- How People with Parkinson's Disease and Health Care Professionals Wish to Partner in Care Using eHealth: Co-Design Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Superusers' Engagement in Asthma Online Communities: Asynchronous Web-Based Interview Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrent health care systems are rarely designed to meet the needs of people living with chronic conditions. However, some patients and informal caregivers are not waiting for the health care system to redesign itself. These individuals are sometimes referred to as e-patients. The first generation of e-patients used the internet for finding information and for communicating with peers. Compared with the first generation, the second generation of e-patients collects their own health data and appears to be more innovative.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to describe the second generation of e-patients through exploration of their active engagement in their self-care and health care.
methodsSemistructured interviews were conducted with 10 patients with chronic conditions and 5 informal caregivers. They were all recruited through a Web-based advertisement. Data were analyzed according to the framework analysis approach, using the 3 concepts of the self-determination theory-autonomy, relatedness, and competence-at the outset.
resultsStudy participants were actively engaged in influencing their self-care and the health care system to improve their own health, as well as the health of others. This occurred at different levels, such as using their own experience when giving presentations and lectures to health care professionals and medical students, working as professional peers in clinical settings, performing self-tracking, contributing with innovations, and being active on social media. When interaction with health care providers was perceived as being insufficient, the participants sought support through their peers, which showed strong relatedness. Competence increased through the use of technology and learning experiences with peers. Their autonomy was important but was sometimes described as involuntary and to give up was not an option for them.
conclusionsLike the first generation of e-patients, the participants frequently searched for Web-based information. However, the second generation of e-patients also produce their own health data, which they learn from and share. They also engage in the innovation of digital tools to meet health-related needs. Utilizing technological developments comes naturally to the second generation of e-patients, even if the health care system is not prepared to support them under these new circumstances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.