Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31418135›Full record

ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2019

Embryonic Cerebellar Graft Morphology Differs in Two Mouse Models of Cerebellar Degeneration.

Zdenka Purkartova, Filip Tichanek, Yaroslav Kolinko, Jan Cendelin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Lurcher Mouse as a Model of Cerebellar Syndromes.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zdenka PurkartovaDepartment of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, alej Svobody 1655/76, 323 00, Plzeň, Czech Republic.
Filip TichanekDepartment of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, alej Svobody 1655/76, 323 00, Plzeň, Czech Republic.
Yaroslav KolinkoDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Karlovarská 48, 301 66, Plzeň, Czech Republic.
Jan CendelinDepartment of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, alej Svobody 1655/76, 323 00, Plzeň, Czech Republic. jan.cendelin@lfp.cuni.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9449-3058
Charles University · CZ

Funding

Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova GAUK 716217Ministry of education, youth and sport of the Czech Republic LO1503Univerzita Karlova v Praze Q39Univerzita Karlova v Praze SVV 260394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebellar diseases causing substantial cell loss often lead to severe functional deficits and restoration of cerebellar function is difficult. Neurotransplantation therapy could become a hopeful method, but there are still many limitations and unknown aspects. Studies in a variety of cerebellar mutant mice reflecting heterogeneity of human cerebellar degenerations show promising results as well as new problems and questions to be answered. The aim of this work was to compare the development of embryonic cerebellar grafts in adult B6CBA Lurcher and B6.BR pcd mutant mice and strain-matched healthy wild type mice. Performance in the rotarod test, graft survival, structure, and volume was examined 2 months after the transplantation or sham-operation. The grafts survived in most of the mice of all types. In both B6CBA and B6.BR wild type mice and in pcd mice, colonization of the host's cerebellum was a common finding, while in Lurcher mice, the grafts showed a low tendency to infiltrate the host's cerebellar tissue. There were no significant differences in graft volume between mutant and wild type mice. Nevertheless, B6CBA mice had smaller grafts than their B6.BR counterparts. The transplantation did not improve the performance in the rotarod test. The study showed marked differences in graft integration into the host's cerebellum in two types of cerebellar mutants, suggesting disease-specific factors influencing graft fate.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsBrain Tissue TransplantationCerebellar DiseasesCerebellumFemaleFetal Tissue TransplantationGraft SurvivalMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Inbred CBAMice, Neurologic MutantsNeurodegenerative DiseasesAtaxiaCerebellar degenerationLurcher mouseNeurotransplantationPcd mouse

Identifiers

PMID31418135
OpenAlexW2968790518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.