Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31418130›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of surgical oncology2019

Perioperative Gemcitabine + Erlotinib Plus Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: ACOSOG Z5041 (Alliance) Phase II Trial.

Alice C Wei, Fang-Shu Ou, Qian Shi, Xiomara Carrero, Eileen M O'Reilly, Jeffrey Meyerhardt, Robert A Wolff, Hedy L Kindler, Douglas B Evans, Vikram Deshpande and 10 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of surgical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.

Alice C WeiUniversity Health Network-Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. weia@mskcc.org.
Fang-Shu OuAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Qian ShiAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Xiomara CarreroAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Eileen M O'ReillyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jeffrey MeyerhardtDana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care, Boston, MA, USA.
Robert A WolffMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Hedy L KindlerUniversity of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Douglas B EvansMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Vikram DeshpandeMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Joseph MisdrajiMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Eric TammMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Dushyant SahaniMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Malcolm MooreUniversity Health Network-Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Elliot NewmanNew York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Nipun MerchantUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine-Sylvester Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA.
Jordan BerlinVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Laura W GoffVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Peter PistersMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Mitchell C PosnerUniversity of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USAlliance Data (United States) · USUniversity of Chicago · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USCancerCare · USMayo Clinic · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNYU Langone Health · USPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CASylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Member Site CoreU10CA180821 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Evanthia Galanis · 2014 to 2026
$177.3M
Collaborations and NCORP Collective ManagementUG1CA189823 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Evanthia Galanis, Olwen Hahn · 2014 to 2026
$120.6M
IROC: Enhancing local enrolling site radiological data capture capabilities for NCTN trialsU24CA180803 · NCI · AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY · PI Thomas J. FitzGerald, MICHAEL V KNOPP · 2014 to 2026
$116.2M
Statistics CoreU10CA180882 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Sumithra Jay Mandrekar · 2014 to 2026
$115.0M
Transgenic Mouse FacilityP30CA033572 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE/BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI STANLEY R. HAMILTON · 1985 to 2026
$86.3M
Convalescent Plasma to Limit Coronavirus Associated ComplicationsUL1TR003167 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI KARP, DANIEL D, MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2019 to 2023
$45.3M
QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW CENTER (QARC)U10CA029511 · NCI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI FITZGERALD, THOMAS J. · 1985 to 2013
$23.4M
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Network Lead Academic Participating Site (LAP) UG1UG1CA233329 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KELLY K HUNT, CHELSEA Camille PINNIX · 2019 to 2026
$11.1M
Network Lead Academic Participating Site: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterUG1CA233290 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI CAROL AGHAJANIAN, Darren Feldman · 2019 to 2026
$10.2M
NCTN Lead Academic Participating Site at Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer CareUG1CA233180 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Harold John Burstein · 2019 to 2026
$8.6M
Washington University/ Siteman Cancer Center Lead Academic SiteU10CA180833 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BARTLETT, NANCY L, KOZOWER, BENJAMIN D · 2014 to 2018
$7.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003167NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA033572NCI NIH HHS U10 CA029511NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180791NCI NIH HHS U10CA180791NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180821NCI NIH HHS U10CA180821NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180836NCI NIH HHS U10CA180836NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180858NCI NIH HHS U10CA180858NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180867NCI NIH HHS U10CA180867NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180882NCI NIH HHS U10CA180882NCI NIH HHS U10CA29511NCI NIH HHS U24 CA180803NCI NIH HHS U24CA180803NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233180NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233270NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233290NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233329
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is considerable interest in a neoadjuvant approach for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study evaluated perioperative gemcitabine + erlotinib (G+E) for resectable PDAC.

methodsA multicenter, cooperative group, single-arm, phase II trial was conducted between April 2009 and November 2013 (ACOSOG Z5041). Patients with biopsy-confirmed PDAC in the pancreatic head without evidence of involvement of major mesenteric vessels (resectable) were eligible. Patients (n = 123) received an 8-week cycle of G+E before and after surgery. The primary endpoint was 2-year overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints included toxicity, response, resection rate, and time to progression. Resectability was assessed retrospectively by central review. The study closed early due to slow accrual, and no formal hypothesis testing was performed.

resultsOverall, 114 patients were eligible, consented, and initiated protocol treatment. By central radiologic review, 97 (85%) of the 114 patients met the protocol-defined resectability criteria. Grade 3+ toxicity was reported in 60% and 79% of patients during the neoadjuvant phase and overall, respectively. Twenty-two of 114 (19%) patients did not proceed to surgery; 83 patients (73%) were successfully resected. R0 and R1 margins were obtained in 67 (81%) and 16 (19%) resected patients, respectively, and 54 patients completed postoperative G+E (65%). The 2-year OS rate for the entire cohort (n = 114) was 40% (95% confidence interval [CI] 31-50), with a median OS of 21.3 months (95% CI 17.2-25.9). The 2-year OS rate for resected patients (n = 83) was 52% (95% CI 41-63), with a median OS of 25.4 months (95% CI 21.8-29.6).

conclusionsFor resectable PDAC, perioperative G+E is feasible. Further evaluation of neoadjuvant strategies in resectable PDAC is warranted with more active systemic regimens.

Indexed as

PancreaticoduodenectomyAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCombined Modality TherapyDeoxycytidineErlotinib HydrochlorideFemaleGemcitabineHumansMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic NeoplasmsDeoxycytidineErlotinib HydrochlorideGemcitabine

Identifiers

PMID31418130
PMCPMC6868305
OpenAlexW2967517485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.