Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31418086›Full record

SynthesisEuropean radiology2020

Diagnostic outcome and safety of CT-guided core needle biopsy for mediastinal masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Han Na Lee, Seong Jong Yun, Jung Im Kim, Chang-Woo Ryu

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Image-Guided Mediastinal Mass Core-Needle Biopsy.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Han Na LeeDepartment of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, 892 Dongnam-ro, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, 05278, Republic of Korea.
Seong Jong YunDepartment of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, 892 Dongnam-ro, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, 05278, Republic of Korea. zoomknight@naver.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3775-5701
Jung Im KimDepartment of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, 892 Dongnam-ro, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, 05278, Republic of Korea.
Chang-Woo RyuDepartment of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, 892 Dongnam-ro, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, 05278, Republic of Korea.
Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic outcomes and complication rates and to identify potential covariates that could influence these results for computed tomography (CT)-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) of mediastinal masses.

methodsA computerized search of the PubMed and EMBASE databases was performed to identify original articles on the use of CT-guided CNB for mediastinal mass. The pooled proportions of the diagnostic yield and accuracy were assessed using random effects modeling. We assessed the pooled proportion of complication rates using random effects or fixed effects modeling. Multivariate meta-regression analyses were performed to evaluate the potential sources of heterogeneity.

resultsEighteen eligible studies (1310 patients with 1345 CT-guided CNBs) were included. The pooled proportions of the diagnostic yield and accuracy of CT-guided CNB for mediastinal masses were 92% (18 studies, 1345 procedures) and 94% (15 studies, 803 procedures), respectively. In the subgroup analysis, the pooled proportions of the total complication rate and major complication rate were 13% and 2%, respectively. In the meta-regression analyses, the number of tissue samplings (odds ratio [OR], 3.3; p = 0.03), real-time fluoroscopy-guided (OR, 2.1; p = 0.02), and percentage of lymphoma (OR, 2.2; p < 0.001) for diagnostic yield, number of tissue samplings (OR = 2.0, p = 0.02) for diagnostic accuracy, and biopsy needle diameter (OR, 2.5; p = 0.002) for total complication rate were all sources of heterogeneity.

conclusionsCT-guided CNB for mediastinal mass demonstrates high diagnostic outcomes and low complication rates. The use of 20-gauge biopsy needles and obtaining ≥ 3 samples may be recommended to improve diagnostic outcomes and decrease complication rates. KEY POINTS: • The pooled estimates of diagnostic yield and accuracy of computed tomography (CT)-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) for mediastinal masses are 92% and 94%, respectively. • The pooled estimates of the total complication rate and major complication rate were 13% and 2%, respectively. • The use of a 20-gauge needle and ≥ 3 tissue samplings are recommended for CT-guided mediastinal CNB to achieve high diagnostic outcomes and lower complication rates.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleFemaleHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMaleMediastinal NeoplasmsMediastinumMiddle AgedOdds RatioRadiography, InterventionalRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedBiopsyComputed tomographyLarge-core needleMediastinal neoplasmMeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID31418086
OpenAlexW2967903845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.