Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31418075›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2020

Religious denomination influencing attitudes towards brain death, organ transplantation and autopsy-a survey among people of different religions.

Y Alhawari, M A Verhoff, H Ackermann, M Parzeller

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Uterus transplantation: what the world's religions have to say.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Y AlhawariInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital, Goethe University, Kennedyallee 104, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. yasmin.alhawari@yahoo.com.
M A VerhoffInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital, Goethe University, Kennedyallee 104, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
H AckermannInstitute of Biostatistics and Mathematical Modeling, Faculty of Medicine, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
M ParzellerInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital, Goethe University, Kennedyallee 104, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background(Brain) death, willingness of organ donation and autopsy are relevant questions of life and death. Religious beliefs are expected to have a significant influence on individual attitudes.

methodsPeople with an active relationship to a religion were surveyed about brain death, organ transplantation and autopsy using an anonymous questionnaire. The study was aimed in particular at students of theology and people in religious communities. In addition to a descriptive statistical analysis, a binary logistic regression analysis was carried out.

resultsFrom November 2016 to April 2017, 1306 people took part in the study. Religious denomination had statistically significant implications. Members of a certain religion were found to share similar positions. Significant differences were noted in the attitudes shown by members of different religions and by those without any religious affiliation. Especially the concept of brain death was rejected by Buddhists. The majority of Sunni Muslims, Hindus and Buddhists rejected organ donation following brain death. In all religious groups, the majority did not possess an organ donor card. Catholics and Protestants had more organ donor cards than any other religious group and more likely supported autopsies.

conclusionReligious denomination plays a central role in the various viewpoints and attitudes. The findings are just as relevant in scientific and public discussions as they are in medical practice and may contribute to increasing sensitivity and professionalism and to facilitate communication.

Indexed as

Attitude to DeathAutopsyBrain DeathReligionTissue and Organ ProcurementAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrgan TransplantationSurveys and QuestionnairesAutopsyBrain death(Legal) medicineOrgan transplantationReligion

Identifiers

PMID31418075
OpenAlexW2967167749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.