Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31417958›Full record

ArticlePleura and peritoneum2019

MESOTIP: Phase II multicenter randomized trial evaluating the association of PIPAC and systemic chemotherapy vs. systemic chemotherapy alone as 1st-line treatment of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma.

Olivia Sgarbura, Sophie Gourgou, Diego Tosi, Naoual Bakrin, Nabila Bouazza, Stéphanie Delaine, Hélène De Forges, Marc Pocard, François Quénet

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pleura and peritoneum, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03574493 (Rectal Surgery Evaluation Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03574493 completednot on this map

Rectal Surgery Evaluation Trial (RESET): Laparotomy vs Laparoscopy vs Robotic vs TaTME Rectal Surgery Matched Parallel Cohort Trial for High Surgical Risk Cancer Patients, With Mid- to Low Rectal Cancer

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorInstitut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'AurelleRan2018 to 2024Enrolled1,098ConditionsRectal CancerArmsTME with LAR
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Advances in the management of peritoneal malignancies.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Primary and metastatic peritoneal surface malignancies.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Olivia SgarburaSurgical oncology Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6965-3697
Sophie GourgouBiometrics Unit, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Diego TosiEarly phase clinical trial unit, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Naoual BakrinSurgery Department, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Claude Bernard University, Lyon, France.
Nabila BouazzaClinical Research Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Univ. Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Stéphanie DelaineClinical Research Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Univ. Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Hélène De ForgesClinical Research Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Univ. Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Marc PocardINSERM U1275, CAP Paris-Tech, Carcinomatosis Peritoneum Paris Technology, Lariboisière Hospital, AP-HP, 2 rue Ambroise Paré - 75010 Paris - Université de Paris, France.
François QuénetSurgical oncology Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Université de Montpellier · FRInserm · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare tumoral disease characterized by the diffuse involvement of the peritoneal serosa. The standard frontline treatment of MPM is cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) unless the peritoneal disease is considered unresectable. For unresectable patients the standard frontline treatment is a combination of cisplatin and pemetrexed but the prognosis remains ominous with only 13 months of overall survival (OS).

methodsThe proposed study is a multicenter randomized non-comparative study evaluating the association of Pressurized Intra-Peritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) and systemic chemotherapy vs. systemic chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment of MPM. Patients will be randomized with a 2:1 ratio using a minimization technique. Sixty-six patients have to be enrolled. Stratification will be performed according to histology (epithelioid vs. sarcomatoid and biphasic), presence of extraperitoneal disease and center. Primary objective is OS and secondary objectives include progression-free survival (PFS), safety, compliance, feasibility, conversion to resectability, histological response to treatment and quality of life.

conclusionsWe expect to show that intensification of the first line treatment with PIPAC for initially unresectable MPM patients increases OS.

trial registrationProspective study. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03574493 EudraCT: 2019-001515-23.

Indexed as

conversion to respectabilityfront lineintraperitoneal chemotherapymalignant peritoneal mesotheliomaPressurized Intra-Peritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC)

Identifiers

PMID31417958
PMCPMC6693480
OpenAlexW2955106727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.