Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31417827›Full record

ArticleCureus2019

Concept for a Fan-beam Computed Tomography Image-guided Radiotherapy Device.

Vincent Weidlich, Lawrence Lechuga, Dennis Dore, Georg A Weidlich, Bill Nighan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vincent WeidlichMedical Physics, Kingston University, Kingston upon Thames, GBR.
Lawrence LechugaMedical Physics, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, USA.
Dennis DoreMiscellaneous, ETM Electromatic Inc., Newark, USA.
Georg A WeidlichRadiation Oncology, National Medical Physics and Dosimetry Company, Palo Alto, USA.
Bill NighanMiscellaneous, ETM Electromatic Inc., Newark, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many advancements taking place in the field of radiation therapy come in the form of increasingly powerful devices and specialized treatments that aim to increase precision, visualization, and facility throughput. Although these devices are very effective at their respective roles within radiotherapy, they are expensive and require specialized vaults to shield the public and the radiation worker from the ionizing radiation. A proposed device, known as the Simple XRT, is designed to circumvent the inherent drawbacks of the current devices. The Simple XRT uses a 6 MV linear accelerator that utilizes diagnostic quality computed tomography (CT) image guidance. Simple XRT will serve as a cost-effective device for treating most cancer indications.

Indexed as

fan beam ct simulationfan beam igrtradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID31417827
PMCPMC6687473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.