Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31417740›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2019

Influence of head morphology and natural postures on sound localization cues in crocodilians.

L Papet, N Grimault, N Boyer, N Mathevon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Spatial release from masking in crocodilians.Communications biology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

L PapetCentre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon - Equipe Cognition Auditive et Psychoacoustique, CNRS UMR 5292, Univ. Lyon 1, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8916-4666
N GrimaultCentre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon - Equipe Cognition Auditive et Psychoacoustique, CNRS UMR 5292, Univ. Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
N BoyerEquipe Neuro-Ethologie Sensorielle ENES/NeuroPSI, CNRS UMR 9197, University of Lyon, Saint-Etienne, France.
N MathevonEquipe Neuro-Ethologie Sensorielle ENES/NeuroPSI, CNRS UMR 9197, University of Lyon, Saint-Etienne, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0219-6601

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As top predators, crocodilians have an acute sense of hearing that is useful for their social life and for probing their environment in hunting situations. Although previous studies suggest that crocodilians are able to localize the position of a sound source, how they do this remains largely unknown. In this study, we measured the potential monaural sound localization cues (head-related transfer functions; HRTFs) on alive animals and skulls in two situations, both mimicking natural positions: basking on the land and cruising at the interface between air and water. Binaural cues were also estimated by measuring the interaural level differences (ILDs) and the interaural time differences (ITDs). In both conditions, HRTF measurements show large spectral variations (greater than 10 dB) for high frequencies, depending on the azimuthal angle. These localization cues are influenced by head size and by the internal coupling of the ears. ITDs give reliable information regarding sound-source position for low frequencies, while ILDs are more suitable for frequencies higher than 1.5 kHz. Our results support the hypothesis that crocodilian head morphology is adapted to acquire reliable localization cues from sound sources when outside the water, but also when only a small part of their head is above the air-water interface.

Indexed as

bioacousticscrocodilianshead-related transfer functionsound localization

Identifiers

PMID31417740
PMCPMC6689610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.