Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31417724›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2019

How much does it cost to save a species from extinction? Costs and rewards of conserving the Lear's macaw.

Antonio E A Barbosa, José L Tella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Antonio E A BarbosaThe National Center for Bird Conservation and Research (CEMAVE), BR 230, Floresta Nacional da Restinga de Cabedelo, Renascer, 58.108-012 Cebedelo-PB, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9921-4479
José L TellaDepartment of Conservation Biology, Estación Biológica de Doñana (CSIC), Avenida Américo Vespucio s/n, 41092 Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3038-7424

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the limited resources available to save species from extinction necessitate the optimization of conservation actions, little is known about their costs and effectiveness. We developed a costs-rewards framework that integrates information on which sectors of society contribute to funding conservation, how much is contributed, how funds are distributed among conservation targets and how these investments drive not only conservation rewards but also the economic and ecosystem services that benefit society. We applied this framework to the Lear's macaw (

Indexed as

conservation costsLear's macawrewardsthreatened species recovery

Identifiers

PMID31417724
PMCPMC6689625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.