Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31417647›Full record

ArticleJournal of Cancer2019

A randomized trial of conventional fraction versus hypofraction radiotherapy for bone metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma.

Jian He, Shiming Shi, Luxi Ye, Guifen Ma, Xiangou Pan, Yan Huang, Zhaochong Zeng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jian HeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Shiming ShiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Luxi YeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Guifen MaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Xiangou PanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Yan HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Zhaochong ZengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Fudan University · CNThe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CNZhongshan Hospital · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) has been reported to be effective in palliating painful bone metastases, but the optimal fractions and doses for treating bone metastases from hepatocelluar carcinoma (HCC) are not established. This study aimed to compare toxicity and efficacy for conventional fraction versus hypofraction schedules. From January 2009 through December 2014, 183 patients with HCC bone metastases were randomly assigned to conventional fraction EBRT (Group A) or hypofraction radiotherapy (Group B). Study outcomes were pain relief, response rate and duration, overall survival, and toxicity incidence. Median follow-up time was 9.3 months. Response times were 6.7 ± 3.3 fractions in Group A and 4.1 ± 1.2 fractions in Group B (p <0.001). Pain relief rates were 96.7% and 91.2% in Group A and B, respectively (p=0.116). Time to treatment failure for Group A was significantly longer than Group B (p=0.025). Median overall survival was similar between two groups (p=0.628). Toxicity incidence in both groups was minimal, with no significant differences observed. In conclusion, hypofractionated radiotherapy is safe for patients with HCC bone metastases and may achieve earlier pain relief compared to conventional radiotherapy. This protocol should be considered for patients with shorter predicted survival times.

Indexed as

conventional fractionationexternal beam radiotherapyhepatocellular carcinomahypofractionatedtoxicity

Identifiers

PMID31417647
PMCPMC6692619
OpenAlexW2963959924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.