Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31417615›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2019

Conservation through the lens of (mal)adaptation: Concepts and meta-analysis.

Alison Margaret Derry, Dylan J Fraser, Steven P Brady, Louis Astorg, Elizabeth R Lawrence, Gillian K Martin, Jean-Michel Matte, Jorge Octavio Negrín Dastis, Antoine Paccard, Rowan D H Barrett and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Engineering Microbial-Electrochemical Interfaces for Sustainable Water Purification.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Towards an integrated understanding of dietary phenotypes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Alison Margaret DerryDépartement des sciences biologiques Université du Québec à Montréal Montreal Quebec Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5768-8027
Dylan J FraserQuebec Center for Biodiversity Science Montreal Quebec Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5686-7338
Steven P BradyBiology Department Southern Connecticut State University New Haven Connecticut.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6119-1363
Louis AstorgDépartement des sciences biologiques Université du Québec à Montréal Montreal Quebec Canada.
Elizabeth R LawrenceBiology Department Concordia University Montreal Quebec Canada.
Gillian K MartinDépartement des sciences biologiques Université du Québec à Montréal Montreal Quebec Canada.
Jean-Michel MatteBiology Department Concordia University Montreal Quebec Canada.
Jorge Octavio Negrín DastisDépartement des sciences biologiques Université du Québec à Montréal Montreal Quebec Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8234-9462
Antoine PaccardRedpath Museum and Department of Biology McGill University Montreal Quebec Canada.
Rowan D H BarrettQuebec Center for Biodiversity Science Montreal Quebec Canada.
Lauren J ChapmanQuebec Center for Biodiversity Science Montreal Quebec Canada.
Jeffrey E LaneDepartment of Biology University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon Saskatchewan Canada.
Chase G BallasDepartment of Biology Pace University New York New York.
Marissa CloseDepartment of Biology Pace University New York New York.
Erika CrispoDepartment of Biology Pace University New York New York.
Université du Québec à Montréal · CAConcordia University · CAMcGill University · CAPace University · USSouthern Connecticut State University · USUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolutionary approaches are gaining popularity in conservation science, with diverse strategies applied in efforts to support adaptive population outcomes. Yet conservation strategies differ in the type of adaptive outcomes they promote as conservation goals. For instance, strategies based on genetic or demographic rescue implicitly target adaptive population

Indexed as

adaptationdemographic rescueevolutionary rescuegene flowgenetic rescuehybridizationtransgenerational plasticitytranslocation

Identifiers

PMID31417615
PMCPMC6691223
OpenAlexW2920835229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.