ReviewEvolutionary applications2019
Maladaptation in feral and domesticated animals.
Review in Evolutionary applications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heritable Genetic Effects Caused by a Single Generation of Captive Breeding.Evolutionary applications · 2026Article
- Article
- Selection for Tameness in Red Junglefowl Recapitulates Genetic Loci Associated With Domestication-Related Brain Composition.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- A universally applicable definition for domestication.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Signals of selection and ancestry in independently feral Gallus gallus populations.Molecular ecology · 2024Article
- Natural selection and genetic diversity maintenance in a parasitic wasp during continuous biological control application.Nature communications · 2024Article
- The meaning of wild: Genetic and adaptive consequences from large-scale releases of domestic mallards.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Domestication affects sex-biased gene expression evolution in the duck.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- Article
- Going Wild in the City-Animal Feralization and Its Impacts on Biodiversity in Urban Environments.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- Historic samples reveal loss of wild genotype through domestic chicken introgression during the Anthropocene.PLoS genetics · 2023Article
- A single introduction of wild rabbits triggered the biological invasion of Australia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Introgression of domesticated salmon changes life history and phenology of a wild salmon population.Evolutionary applications · 2022Article
- The Life Span and Levels of Oxidative Stress in Foragers Between Feral and Managed Honey Bee Colonies.Journal of insect science (Online) · 2022Article
- Population genomic, olfactory, dietary, and gut microbiota analyses demonstrate the unique evolutionary trajectory of feral pigs.Molecular ecology · 2022Article
- How much energetic trade-offs limit selection? Insights from livestock and related laboratory model species.Evolutionary applications · 2021Article
- The cerebellar anatomy of red junglefowl and white leghorn chickens: insights into the effects of domestication on the cerebellum.Royal Society open science · 2021Article
- Genomics of Adaptations in Ungulates.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Review
- A workflow to design new directed domestication programs to move forward current and future insect production.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2021Article
- Predicted Aflatoxin BToxins · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Selection regimes and population structures can be powerfully changed by domestication and feralization, and these changes can modulate animal fitness in both captive and natural environments. In this review, we synthesize recent studies of these two processes and consider their impacts on organismal and population fitness. Domestication and feralization offer multiple windows into the forms and mechanisms of maladaptation. Firstly, domestic and feral organisms that exhibit suboptimal traits or fitness allow us to identify their underlying causes within tractable research systems. This has facilitated significant progress in our general understandings of genotype-phenotype relationships, fitness trade-offs, and the roles of population structure and artificial selection in shaping domestic and formerly domestic organisms. Additionally, feralization of artificially selected gene variants and organisms can reveal or produce maladaptation in other inhabitants of an invaded biotic community. In these instances, feral animals often show similar fitness advantages to other invasive species, but they are also unique in their capacities to modify natural ecosystems through introductions of artificially selected traits. We conclude with a brief consideration of how emerging technologies such as genome editing could change the tempos, trajectories, and ecological consequences of both domestication and feralization. In addition to providing basic evolutionary insights, our growing understanding of mechanisms through which artificial selection can modulate fitness has diverse and important applications-from enhancing the welfare, sustainability, and efficiency of agroindustry, to mitigating biotic invasions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.