ReviewFrontiers in neuroinformatics2019
Comparing Open-Source Toolboxes for Processing and Analysis of Spike and Local Field Potentials Data.
Review in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Parietal cortex is recruited by frontal and cingulate areas to support action monitoring and updating during stopping.NeuroImage · 2025Article
- Improving data sharing and knowledge transfer via the Neuroelectrophysiology Analysis Ontology (NEAO).Scientific data · 2025Article
- [Analysis of nerve excitability in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus in cerebral ischaemia-reperfusion mice].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2024Article
- Recognition of sounds by ensembles of proteinoids.Materials today. Bio · 2024Article
- DeePhys: A machine learning-assisted platform for electrophysiological phenotyping of human neuronal networks.Stem cell reports · 2024Article
- The technology, opportunities, and challenges of Synthetic Biological Intelligence.Biotechnology advances · 2023Review
- Article
- Dissecting cascade computational components in spiking neural networks.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- SANTIA: a Matlab-based open-source toolbox for artifact detection and removal from extracellular neuronal signals.Brain informatics · 2021Article
- Electrophysiological Analysis of Brain Organoids: Current Approaches and Advancements.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Review
- Integrated open-source software for multiscale electrophysiology.Scientific data · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Analysis of spike and local field potential (LFP) data is an essential part of neuroscientific research. Today there exist many open-source toolboxes for spike and LFP data analysis implementing various functionality. Here we aim to provide a practical guidance for neuroscientists in the choice of an open-source toolbox best satisfying their needs. We overview major open-source toolboxes for spike and LFP data analysis as well as toolboxes with tools for connectivity analysis, dimensionality reduction and generalized linear modeling. We focus on comparing toolboxes functionality, statistical and visualization tools, documentation and support quality. To give a better insight, we compare and illustrate functionality of the toolboxes on open-access dataset or simulated data and make corresponding MATLAB scripts publicly available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.