Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31417347›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2019

A 3D Printed Device for Low Cost Neural Stimulation in Mice.

Taylor J Morrison, Elana Sefton, Melissa Marquez-Chin, Milos R Popovic, Cindi M Morshead, Hani E Naguib

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Printable devices for neurotechnology.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Taylor J MorrisonDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Elana SeftonInstitute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Melissa Marquez-ChinDepartment of Engineering, Universidad Iberoamericana, Mexico City, Mexico.
Milos R PopovicInstitute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Cindi M MorsheadInstitute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Hani E NaguibDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAUniversity Health Network · CAToronto Rehabilitation Institute · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrical stimulation of the brain through the implantation of electrodes is an effective treatment for certain diseases and the focus of a large body of research investigating new cell mechanisms, neurological phenomena, and treatments. Electrode devices developed for stimulation in rodents vary widely in size, cost, and functionality, with the majority of recent studies presenting complex, multi-functional designs. While some experiments require these added features, others are in greater need of reliable, low cost, and readily available devices that will allow surgeries to be scheduled and completed without delay. In this work, we utilize 3D printing and common electrical hardware to produce an effective 2-channel stimulation device that meets these requirements. Our stimulation electrode has not failed in over 60 consecutive surgeries, costs less than $1 USD, and can be assembled in less than 20 min. 3D printing minimizes the amount of material used in manufacturing the device and enables one to match the curvature of the connector's base with the curvature of the mouse skull, producing an ultra-lightweight, low size device with improved adhesion to the mouse skull. The range of the stimulation parameters used with the proposed device was: pulse amplitude 1-200 μA, pulse duration 50-500 μs and pulse frequency 1-285 Hz.

Indexed as

3D printingbrain stimulationmanufacturingneural implantationplatinum wire electrode

Identifiers

PMID31417347
PMCPMC6682623
OpenAlexW2958184133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.