ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2019
MRI-Driven PET Image Optimization for Neurological Applications.
Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Utility of cortical tissue analysis in normal pressure hydrocephalus.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Cyclic 2.5D Perceptual Loss for Cross-Modal 3D Medical Image Synthesis: T1w MRI to Tau PET.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- Critical review of partial volume correction methods in PET and SPECT imaging: benefits, pitfalls, challenges, and future outlook.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Review
- Conductivity-based choline contrast as a potential imaging biomarker for assessing abnormal choline metabolism.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Article
- Nanomaterial-Based Molecular Imaging in Cancer: Advances in Simulation and AI Integration.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Device-assisted strategies for drug delivery across the blood-brain barrier to treat glioblastoma.Communications materials · 2025Review
- Limited Additional Value of a Chest CT in Whole-Body Staging with PET-MRI: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Cancers · 2024Article
- Multiparametric MRI for characterization of the tumour microenvironment.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2024Review
- An update on the use of image-derived input functions for human PET studies: new hopes or old illusions?EJNMMI research · 2023Review
- State-of-the-art imaging of neuromodulatory subcortical systems in aging and Alzheimer's disease: Challenges and opportunities.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2023Review
- Recent Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases Research Using Animal Models and PET Radioisotope Tracers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Construction and imaging of a neurovascular unit model.Neural regeneration research · 2022Review
- Synergistic motion compensation strategies for positron emission tomography when acquired simultaneously with magnetic resonance imaging.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2021Review
- Experimental Therapeutic Strategies in Epilepsies Using Anti-Seizure Medications.Journal of experimental pharmacology · 2021Review
- Technical Note: Ultra high-resolution radiotracer-specific digital pet brain phantoms based on the BigBrain atlas.Medical physics · 2020Article
- The Added Value of Diagnostic and Theranostic PET Imaging for the Treatment of CNS Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Role of Nuclear Imaging to Understand the Neural Substrates of Brain Disorders in Laboratory Animals: Current Status and Future Prospects.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2020Review
- Methods for Quantifying Neurotransmitter Dynamics in the Living Brain With PET Imaging.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are established imaging modalities for the study of neurological disorders, such as epilepsy, dementia, psychiatric disorders and so on. Since these two available modalities vary in imaging principle and physical performance, each technique has its own advantages and disadvantages over the other. To acquire the mutual complementary information and reinforce each other, there is a need for the fusion of PET and MRI. This combined dual-modality (either sequential or simultaneous) could generate preferable soft tissue contrast of brain tissue, flexible acquisition parameters, and minimized exposure to radiation. The most unique superiority of PET/MRI is mainly manifested in MRI-based improvement for the inherent limitations of PET, such as motion artifacts, partial volume effect (PVE) and invasive procedure in quantitative analysis. Head motion during scanning significantly deteriorates the effective resolution of PET image, especially for the dynamic scan with lengthy time. Hybrid PET/MRI device can offer motion correction (MC) for PET data through MRI information acquired simultaneously. Regarding the PVE associated with limited spatial resolution, the process and reconstruction of PET data can be further optimized by using acquired MRI either sequentially or simultaneously. The quantitative analysis of dynamic PET data mainly relies upon an invasive arterial blood sampling procedure to acquire arterial input function (AIF). An image-derived input function (IDIF) method without the need of arterial cannulization, can serve as a potential alternative estimation of AIF. Compared with using PET data only, combining anatomical or functional information from MRI for improving the accuracy in IDIF approach has been demonstrated. Yet, due to the interference and inherent disparity between the two modalities, these methods for optimizing PET image based on MRI still have many technical challenges. This review discussed upon the most recent progress, current challenges and future directions of MRI-driven PET data optimization for neurological applications, with either sequential or simultaneous acquisition approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.