Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31417315›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2019

Safety and efficacy of amrubicin monotherapy in patients with platinum-refractory metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract: a single cancer center retrospective study.

Yusuke Kitagawa, Hiroki Osumi, Eiji Shinozaki, Yumiko Ota, Izuma Nakayama, Takeshi Suzuki, Takeru Wakatsuki, Takashi Ichimura, Mariko Ogura, Akira Ooki and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Yusuke KitagawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroki OsumiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Eiji ShinozakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Yumiko OtaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Izuma NakayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeshi SuzukiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeru WakatsukiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi IchimuraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Mariko OguraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Akira OokiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Daisuke TakahariDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Mitsukuni SuenagaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Keisho ChinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Kensei YamaguchiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatients with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma (GI-NEC) have poor prognoses. Although platinum-based combination chemotherapy is commonly used as first-line treatment, the benefit of amrubicin (AMR) and salvage chemotherapy in those who develop platinum-refractory GI-NEC remains unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AMR monotherapy in patients with platinum-refractory GI-NEC. PATIENTS AND

methodsPlatinum-refractory GI-NEC patients who received AMR monotherapy between April 2012 and September 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events were evaluated. PFS and OS were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared using log-rank tests.

resultsIn total, 16 patients were enrolled. Of them, 13 (81.3%), 1 (6.2%), and 2 (12.5%) received cisplatin plus irinotecan, cisplatin plus etoposide, and fluoropyrimidine plus platinum, respectively, before AMR monotherapy. The primary sites of NEC included the esophagus (N=3, 18.8%), stomach (N=10, 62.5%), duodenum (N=1, 6.2%) and colorectum (N=2, 12.5%). Patients were administered a median of 3 (range, 1-15) cycles of AMR. The ORR was 6.3%, and the median PFS and OS were 2.9 months (95% CI: 1.7-7.4) and 13.8 months (95% CI: 7.9-23.5), respectively. Neutropenia was the most serious adverse event. Grade 3 or higher neutropenia and febrile neutropenia occurred in 50.0% and 6.2% of patients, respectively. Other nonhematological toxicities were not severe, and no treatment-related deaths occurred. The 10 patients who received subsequent chemotherapy after AMR had significantly longer OS than those who did not (17.3 months vs 8.9 months;

conclusionAMR is feasible with minimal side effects for platinum-refractory GI-NEC. Organ-specific subsequent chemotherapy after AMR may improve patient survival.

Indexed as

amrubicin monotherapygastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinomaplatinum refractory

Identifiers

PMID31417315
PMCPMC6599893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.