Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31417264›Full record

ReviewTherapeutics and clinical risk management2019

Analgesia and sedation post-coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a review of the literature.

Mansour Jannati, Armin Attar

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05308797 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Combine Serratus Anterior Plane Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block in Coronary Bypass Surgery: Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAnkara City Hospital BilkentRan2022 to 2022Enrolled60ConditionsCardiac Surgery, Postoperative Pain, Regional Anesthesia MorbidityArmsESP block, CASP block
NCT06642077 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Local Anaesthetic Agents on Opioid Use and Recovery in Patients Undergoing Open Heart Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorYuzuncu Yil UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsAnalgesics, Opioid, Anesthetics, LocalArmsLIDOFAST 40 mg/2 ml + 0.025 mg/2 ml
NCT06657261 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Chest Wall Blocks in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorAnkara City Hospital BilkentRan2024 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsCoronary Arterial Disease (CAD), Serratus Anterior Muscle Plane Block, Transversus Thoracis Muscle Plane Block, Postoperative AnalgesiaArmsThe patient group receiving deep and superficial serratus anterior plane block, The patient group receiving a combination of deep serratus anterior plane block and transverse thoracic muscle plane block
NCT06971432 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Serratus Anterior Plane Block and Serratus Anterior Plane Block + Continuous Wound Infiltration With Catheter on Postoperative Pain After Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorAnkara City Hospital BilkentRan2024 to 2024Enrolled46ConditionsPostoperative Pain, Minimal Invasive Cardiac SurgeryArmsGroup SAPB, Group SAPB + LIA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Pupillometric Monitoring of Nociception in Cardiac Anesthesia.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2020
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mansour JannatiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Faghihi Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Armin AttarCardiovascular Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review aimed to study the role of analgesia and sedation after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, regarding pain management, assisted respiration, overall postoperative health care, and hospitalization. Data were collected from Pubmed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. The following terms were used for the search: "analgesia", "sedation", "coronary artery bypass grafting", CABG", and "opioids". Articles between the years 1988 and 2018 were evaluated. Several opioid and non-opioid analgesics used to relieve surgical pain are regarded as critical risk factors for developing pulmonary and cardiovascular complications in all kinds of thoracic surgery, especially CABG procedures. Effective pain management in post-CABG patients is largely dependent on effective pain assessment, type of sedatives and analgesics administered, and evaluation of their effects on pain relief. A significant challenge is to determine adequate amounts of administered analgesics and sedatives for postoperative CABG patients, because patients often order more sedatives and analgesics than needed. The pain management process is deemed successful when patients feel comfortable after surgery, with no negative side effects. However, postoperative pain management patterns have not included many modern methods such as patient-controlled analgesia, and postoperative pain management drugs are still limited to a restricted range of opioid and non-opioid analgesics.

Indexed as

analgesiacoronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)ICUopioidssedation

Identifiers

PMID31417264
PMCPMC6592068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.