Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31417191›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2020

Genetics workforce: distribution of genetics services and challenges to health care in California.

Monica Penon-Portmann, Jiyoo Chang, Mira Cheng, Joseph T Shieh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Artificial intelligence in clinical genetics: Current practice and attitudes among the clinical genetics workforce.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Assessing genetic counseling efficiency with natural language processing.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Disparities in access to reproductive genetic services associated with geographic location of residence and maternal race and ethnicity.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Diagnostic deserts: Community-level barriers to appropriate genetics services.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Monica Penon-PortmannDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Medical Genetics, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3011-440X
Jiyoo ChangInstitute for Human Genetics, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Mira ChengInstitute for Human Genetics, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3300-0018
Joseph T ShiehDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Medical Genetics, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. joseph.shieh2@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0746-6084
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Sharing Aggregate Genomics Research Findings with Diverse Participants: A Pilot Study of an Innovative Design StrategyU01HG009599 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KOENIG, BARBARA A., KWOK, PUI-YAN · 2017 to 2021
$16.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG009599
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAccess to genetics health-care services is often complicated by the distance to hospitals, workforce shortages, and insurance coverage. Despite technological advances and decreasing costs of genetic sequencing, the benefits of personalized medicine may be inaccessible to many patients. To assess potential disparities in care, we examined the genetics workforce in California and geographical issues that people encounter in seeking care.

methodsData on all board-certified genetics providers were analyzed including medical geneticists (MGs) and genetic counselors (GCs) in California. To assess distance traveled for care, we computed the distance patients traveled for n = 288 visits to University of California-San Francisco (UCSF) Medical Genetics. We performed geographic optimization to minimize the distance to genetics providers.

resultsThe provider-to-patient ratio in California is 1:330,000 for MGs, 1:100,000 for GCs, and 1:1,520,000 for biochemical MGs. Genetics providers are concentrated in major metropolitan areas in California. People travel up to 386 miles for genetics care within the state (mean = 76.6 miles).

conclusionThere are substantial geographic barriers to genetics care that could increase disparities. Our findings highlight a challenging genetics workforce shortage. The shortage may be even greater due to care subspecialization or lack of full-time equivalency and staffing. We are currently promoting efforts to increase remote health-care options, training, and modified models of care.

Indexed as

Genetic ServicesCaliforniaHealth Services AccessibilityHealth WorkforceHumansInsurance CoverageTraveldisparitiesprovider shortagetelegeneticstelehealthworkforce

Identifiers

PMID31417191
PMCPMC10218759
OpenAlexW2968029180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.