Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31417143›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2019

Improving neonatal resuscitation in Tennessee: a large-scale, quality improvement project.

Ajay J Talati, Theresa A Scott, Brenda Barker, Peter H Grubb, Tennessee Initiative for Perinatal Quality Care Golden Hour Project Team

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Developing a Unit-Based Quality Improvement Program in a Large Neonatal ICU.Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ajay J TalatiThe University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA. atalati@uthsc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1798-9970
Theresa A ScottVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
Brenda BarkerVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
Peter H GrubbVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9544-7555
Tennessee Initiative for Perinatal Quality Care Golden Hour Project Team

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe report a statewide collaborative quality initiative to improve resuscitation and stabilization practices following introduction of the 6th edition of the Neonatal Resuscitation Program.

methodsParticipants drafted a consensus toolkit of interventions and corresponding measures. Hospital teams collected baseline data, and implemented changes using PDSA-cycles and statistical process control charts.

resultsNine Tennessee NICUs submitted data on 3771 resuscitations. "Special cause" improvements were achieved and sustained for pre-resuscitation checklists (77-90%) and team briefings (80-92%). Time to intravenous access (50-42 min), glucose infusion initiation (73-60 min), and antibiotic dosing (113-98 min) were also significantly reduced. Teams were unable to meet new NRP oxygen saturation targets. Improvements in post-resuscitation debriefing were not sustained, while communication with parents declined significantly (68-60%).

conclusionLarge-scale collaboration facilitated statewide implementation of new guidelines, while highlighting under-appreciated systems challenges among competing resource demands.

Indexed as

ChecklistQuality ImprovementHumansInfant, NewbornPractice Guidelines as TopicResuscitationTennessee

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.