Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31417094›Full record

Observational studyNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2019

COPD overdiagnosis in primary care: a UK observational study of consistency of airflow obstruction.

Lynn Josephs, David Culliford, Matthew Johnson, Mike Thomas

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Lung NR3C1Communications biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Clarifying Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Genetic Associations Observed in Biobanks via Mediation Analysis of Smoking.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. GPs should not try to detect mild COPD.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lynn JosephsDepartment of Primary Care & Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7157-2992
David CullifordNIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for Wessex Data Science Hub, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1663-0253
Matthew JohnsonNIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for Wessex Data Science Hub, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5597-6615
Mike ThomasDepartment of Primary Care & Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. D.M.Thomas@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5939-1155

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1016Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is heterogeneous, but persistent airflow obstruction (AFO) is fundamental to diagnosis. We studied AFO consistency from initial diagnosis and explored factors associated with absent or inconsistent AFO. This was a retrospective observational study using patient-anonymised routine individual data in Care and Health Information Analytics (CHIA) database. Identifying a prevalent COPD cohort based on diagnostic codes in primary care records, we used serial ratios of forced expiratory volume in 1 s to forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC%) from time of initial COPD diagnosis to assign patients to one of three AFO categories, according to whether all (persistent), some (variable) or none (absent) were <70%. We described respiratory prescriptions over 3 years (2011-2013) and used multivariable logistic regression to estimate odds of absent or variable AFO and potential predictors. We identified 14,378 patients with diagnosed COPD (mean ± SD age 68.8 ± 10.7 years), median (IQR) COPD duration of 60 (25,103) months. FEV1/FVC% was recorded in 12,491 (86.9%) patients: median (IQR) 5 (3, 7) measurements. Six thousand five hundred and fifty (52.4%) had persistent AFO, 4507 (36.1%) variable AFO and 1434 (11.5%) absent AFO. Being female, never smoking, having higher BMI or more comorbidities significantly predicted absent and variable AFO. Despite absent AFO, 57% received long-acting bronchodilators and 60% inhaled corticosteroids (50% and 49%, respectively, in those without asthma). In all, 13.1% of patients diagnosed with COPD had unrecorded FEV1/FVC%; 11.5% had absent AFO on repeated measurements, yet many received inhalers likely to be ineffective. Such prescribing is not evidence based and the true cause of symptoms may have been missed.

Indexed as

Medical OveruseAgedAirway ObstructionFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHumansLungMalePrevalencePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRetrospective StudiesSpirometryUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID31417094
PMCPMC6695394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.