Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31417075›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Separate lanes for adding and reading in the white matter highways of the human brain.

Mareike Grotheer, Zonglei Zhen, Garikoitz Lerma-Usabiaga, Kalanit Grill-Spector

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Structural Fingerprinting of the Frontal Aslant Tract: Predicting Cognitive Control Capacity and Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  13. Human white matter myelinates faster in utero than ex utero.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mareike GrotheerPsychology Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. grotheer@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8653-1157
Zonglei ZhenBeijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China.
Garikoitz Lerma-UsabiagaPsychology Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Kalanit Grill-SpectorPsychology Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5404-9606
Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language · ESBeijing Normal University · CNNeurosciences Institute · USStanford University · US

Funding

Functional-neuroanatomy of high-level visual cortex: a quantitative multimodal approachR01EY023915 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Kalanit Grill-Spector · 2014 to 2026
$4.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023915
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Math and reading involve distributed brain networks and have both shared (e.g. encoding of visual stimuli) and dissociated (e.g. quantity processing) cognitive components. Yet, to date, the shared vs. dissociated gray and white matter substrates of the math and reading networks are unknown. Here, we define these networks and evaluate the structural properties of their fascicles using functional MRI, diffusion MRI, and quantitative MRI. Our results reveal that there are distinct gray matter regions which are preferentially engaged in either math (adding) or reading, and that the superior longitudinal and arcuate fascicles are shared across the math and reading networks. Strikingly, within these fascicles, reading- and math-related tracts are segregated into parallel sub-bundles and show structural differences related to myelination. These findings open a new avenue of research that examines the contribution of sub-bundles within fascicles to specific behaviors.

Indexed as

MathematicsReadingAdultBrainDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleFunctional NeuroimagingGray MatterHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve Fibers, MyelinatedNeural PathwaysWhite MatterYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31417075
PMCPMC6695422
OpenAlexW2968343097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.