Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31417036›Full record

ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2019

A novel ready-to-use dry-reagent polymerase chain reaction for detection of

Mukti Nath Mishra, Raghavendra D Kulkarni, Jeevanandam Mohanraj, S Durairaju Nisshanthini, G S Ajantha, Arun Chandrasekhar, Prachee Kenge, Shama Bhat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mukti Nath MishraDepartment of Molecular Diagnostics, Bhat Biotech India Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru, India.
Raghavendra D KulkarniDepartment of Microbiology, SDM College of Medical Sciences & Hospital, Dharwad, India.
Jeevanandam MohanrajDepartment of Molecular Diagnostics, Bhat Biotech India Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru, India.
S Durairaju NisshanthiniDepartment of Molecular Diagnostics, Bhat Biotech India Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru, India.
G S AjanthaDepartment of Microbiology, SDM College of Medical Sciences & Hospital, Dharwad, India.
Arun ChandrasekharDepartment of Molecular Diagnostics, Bhat Biotech India Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru, India.
Prachee KengeDepartment of Molecular Diagnostics, Bhat Biotech India Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru, India.
Shama BhatDepartment of Molecular Diagnostics, Bhat Biotech India Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & objectives: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has wide acceptance for rapid identification of pathogens and also for diagnosis of infectious conditions. However, because of economic and expertise constraints, a majority of small or peripheral laboratories do not use PCR. The objective of the present study was to develop a dry-reagent PCR assay as an alternative to conventional PCR to assess its applicability in routine laboratory practice using malB gene for identification of Escherichia coli as a model. Methods: A total of 184 isolates were selected for the study comprising clinical isolates of E. coli and non-E. coli including Shigella sp. and a few other control strains. The DNA was isolated from all the isolates. The isolated DNA as well as the overnight grown bacterial cultures were subjected to both conventional wet PCR and dry-reagent PCR. Results: The genomic DNA isolated from E. coli showed amplification of malB gene in both conventional wet and dry-reagent PCR and the band was observed at 491 bp. In dry-reagent PCR, the overnight grown E. coli cells also showed positive result. The non-E. coli strains other than Shigella sp. showed negative in both conventional wet and dry-reagent PCR. Shigella sp. showed positive in both conventional wet and dry-reagent PCR. Interpretation & conclusions: Considering the elimination of genomic DNA isolation step, and similar results with the conventional wet PCR, dry-reagent PCR may be a good alternative for the conventional wet PCR.

Indexed as

Bacterial InfectionsDiarrheaDNA, BacterialEscherichia coliFecesHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionShigellaDNA, BacterialABC transporter - dry-reagent PCR - Escherichia coli- malBgene - maltose/maltodextrin transporter ATP-binding gene - pathogensShigella sp.

Identifiers

PMID31417036
PMCPMC6702690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.