Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2019
Radiotherapy versus transoral robotic surgery and neck dissection for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (ORATOR): an open-label, phase 2, randomised trial.
Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 208 papers, 18 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase II Randomized Trial for Early-stage Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oropharynx: Radiotherapy vs Trans-oral Robotic Surgery (ORATOR)
Primary Surgery Vs Primary Chemoradiation for Oropharyngeal Cancer (Scope Trial) - A Phase II/III Integrated Design Randomized Control Trial
Who cites it
208 citing papers in PubMed, 18 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 453 citations in OpenAlex.
- TLM, TORS and RT in early supraglottic SCC: a meta-analysis of oncological and functional outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Transoral robotic surgery using the da Vinci single-port system: current evidence and clinical indications - a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- SEOM-TTCC clinical guidelines for the treatment of head and neck cancer (2025).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Guideline
- A comparative analysis of transoral laser microsurgery and transoral robotic surgery for the treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- A Meta-analysis of Functional Outcomes and Recovery Metrics Comparing Transoral Robotic Surgery and (Chemo)Radiotherapy.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Radiotherapy integration after transoral robotic surgery in head and neck cancer: a bibliometric and knowledge-mapping analysis of adjuvant treatment, de-escalation, functional preservation, and survival outcomes.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Unilateral vs Bilateral Transoral Surgery for Tonsillar Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Evidence-based guideline diagnosis, treatment, prevention and aftercare of oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma.German medical science : GMS e-journal · 2025Guideline
- Artificial intelligence in dysphagia since the 21st century: a bibliometric and visualization study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- The emerging role of robotics in plastic and reconstructive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Transoral robotic surgery vs. non-robotic surgeries for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- The relevance of ototoxicity induced by radiotherapy.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Interventions for head and neck cancer survivors: Systematic review.Head & neck · 2022Pooled it
- Molecular prognostic indicators in HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer: an updated review.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2022Pooled it
- Transoral robotic surgery and intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of the oropharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021Pooled it
- SEOM clinical guidelines for the treatment of head and neck cancer (2020).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021Guideline
- Survival Outcomes in Human Papillomavirus-Associated Nonoropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2020Pooled it
- Risk-adapted therapy guided by human papillomavirus (HPV) circulating tumor DNA in HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer (ReACT 1.0): an exploratory phase II trial.Nature communications · 2026Trial
- A Phase 2 Exploratory Trial Evaluating Computed Tomography-Based Midtreatment Nodal Response to Select for De-escalated Chemoradiation Therapy in the Definitive Management of p16+ Oropharyngeal Cancer.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026Trial
148 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
33 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTransoral robotic surgery (TORS) with concurrent neck dissection has supplanted radiotherapy in the USA as the most common treatment for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), yet no randomised trials have compared these modalities. We aimed to evaluate differences in quality of life (QOL) 1 year after treatment.
methodsThe ORATOR trial was an investigator-initiated, multicentre, international, open-label, parallel-group, phase 2, randomised study. Patients were enrolled at six hospitals in Canada and Australia. We randomly assigned (1:1) patients aged 18 years or older, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scores of 0-2, and with T1-T2, N0-2 (≤4 cm) OPSCC tumour types to radiotherapy (70 Gy, with chemotherapy if N1-2) or TORS plus neck dissection (with or without adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, based on pathology). Following stratification by p16 status, patients were randomly assigned using a computer-generated randomisation list with permuted blocks of four. The primary endpoint was swallowing-related QOL at 1 year as established using the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) score, powered to detect a 10-point improvement (a clinically meaningful change) in the TORS plus neck dissection group. All analyses were done by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01590355) and is active, but not currently recruiting.
findings68 patients were randomly assigned (34 per group) between Aug 10, 2012, and June 9, 2017. Median follow-up was 25 months (IQR 20-33) for the radiotherapy group and 29 months (23-43) for the TORS plus neck dissection group. MDADI total scores at 1 year were mean 86·9 (SD 11·4) in the radiotherapy group versus 80·1 (13·0) in the TORS plus neck dissection group (p=0·042). There were more cases of neutropenia (six [18%] of 34 patients vs none of 34), hearing loss (13 [38%] vs five [15%]), and tinnitus (12 [35%] vs two [6%]) reported in the radiotherapy group than in the TORS plus neck dissection group, and more cases of trismus in the TORS plus neck dissection group (nine [26%] vs one [3%]). The most common adverse events in the radiotherapy group were dysphagia (n=6), hearing loss (n=6), and mucositis (n=4), all grade 3, and in the TORS plus neck dissection group, dysphagia (n=9, all grade 3) and there was one death caused by bleeding after TORS.
interpretationPatients treated with radiotherapy showed superior swallowing-related QOL scores 1 year after treatment, although the difference did not represent a clinically meaningful change. Toxicity patterns differed between the groups. Patients with OPSCC should be informed about both treatment options.
fundingCanadian Cancer Society Research Institute Grant (#701842), Ontario Institute for Cancer Research Clinician-Scientist research grant, and the Wolfe Surgical Research Professorship in the Biology of Head and Neck Cancers grant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.