Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31416576›Full record

SynthesisMutation research. Reviews in mutation research

Meta-analysis of chromosomal aberrations as a biomarker of exposure in healthcare workers occupationally exposed to antineoplastic drugs.

Christine Roussel, Kristine L Witt, Peter B Shaw, Thomas H Connor

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Mutation research. Reviews in mutation research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Exposure to Antineoplastic Drugs in Occupational Settings: A Systematic Review of Biological Monitoring Data.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Safe handling of hazardous drugs.Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Chromosome Aberrations in Lymphocytes of Patients Undergoing Radon Spa Therapy: An Explorative mFISH Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christine RousselDoylestown Hospital, 595 West State Street, Doylestown, PA, 18901, United States. Electronic address: croussel@dh.org.
Kristine L WittBiomolecular Screening Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences/Division of the National Toxicology Program, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, United States. Electronic address: witt@niehs.nih.gov.
Peter B ShawDivision of Applied Research and Technology, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 1090 Tusculum Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45226, United States. Electronic address: pshaw@cdc.gov.
Thomas H ConnorDivision of Applied Research and Technology, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 1090 Tusculum Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45226, United States. Electronic address: tconnor@cdc.gov.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · USDoylestown Hospital · USNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many antineoplastic drugs used to treat cancer, particularly alkylating agents and topoisomerase inhibitors, are known to induce genetic damage in patients. Elevated levels of chromosomal aberrations, micronuclei, and DNA damage have been documented in cancer patients. Elevations in these same biomarkers of genetic damage have been reported in numerous studies of healthcare workers, such as nurses and pharmacists, who routinely handle these drugs, but results vary across studies. To obtain an overall assessment of the exposure effect, we performed a meta-analysis on data obtained from peer-reviewed publications reporting chromosomal aberration levels in healthcare workers exposed to antineoplastic drugs. A literature search identified 39 studies reporting on occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs and measurement of chromosomal aberrations in healthcare workers. After applying strict inclusion criteria for data quality and presentation, data from 17 studies included in 16 publications underwent meta-analysis using Hedges' bias-corrected g and a random-effects model. Results showed the level of chromosomal aberrations in healthcare workers exposed to antineoplastic drugs was significantly higher than in controls. The standardized mean differences (difference of means divided by within sd) from all studies were pooled, yielding a value 1.006 (unitless) with p<0.001. Thus, in addition to the documented genotoxic effects of antineoplastic drugs in cancer patients, this meta-analysis confirmed a significant association between occupational exposure to antineoplastics during the course of a normal work day and increases in chromosomal aberrations in healthcare workers. Based on the studies reviewed, we were unable to accurately assess whether appropriate use of protective measures might reduce the incidence of genetic damage in healthcare workers. However, given the potential for increased cancer risk linked to increases in chromosomal aberrations, the results of this study support the need to limit occupational exposure of healthcare workers to antineoplastic drugs as much as possible.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkersChromosome AberrationsDNA DamageHealth PersonnelHumansMicronucleus TestsMutagensOccupational ExposureAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkersMutagensAntineoplastic drugsCancer riskGenetic damageHealthcare workers

Identifiers

PMID31416576
PMCPMC7919743
OpenAlexW2749886505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.